pheadtony.bsky.social
Near Bristol UK.
Likes: well behaved politicians, bikes, football (#LFC)
Dislikes: dishonesty, populist nonsense
1,081 posts
279 followers
1,017 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Just guessing, but there's probably more than 1 thing people are unhappy with ππΌ
comment in response to
post
Warwick is one of the top ranked universities in the country. They must be doing it mostly right.
Another of the top unis is Durham. A quick Google tells me their staff profile is similar.
I'm wondering if the poorer unis have less 'admin' staff per student?
Any ideas?
comment in response to
post
If she's serious there's not that many levers to pull. Allowing applicants to work would help, I guess.
comment in response to
post
How many staff would you expect for an efficient university?
comment in response to
post
Never heard of him but he sounds lovely.
comment in response to
post
π₯Ή
comment in response to
post
Shots fired, as the kids used to say
comment in response to
post
Oh no.
comment in response to
post
#compoface
comment in response to
post
It is important that he is asked when he will retract this absurd false claim about Kent spending Β£87 million/year on recruitment, until he does retract it
comment in response to
post
Grr woke
comment in response to
post
Famous person = more publicity and broader /deeper reach.
Same as always.
comment in response to
post
No, still work to do.
comment in response to
post
So it was already clear, we can draw a line under that going forward and assume everyone knows where they stand? π
comment in response to
post
She said she doesn't care about those? π€―
comment in response to
post
If he is, he's keeping his head down.
comment in response to
post
Hahahaha hahahaha πΊπΈπ
comment in response to
post
What a headline π«
comment in response to
post
"looking" is there any indication that he has received any more intelligence on the situation than the average Fox viewer?
comment in response to
post
I doubt they did really. Diplomacy innit.
comment in response to
post
Yes exactly. That's the point, they are talking about her. That is the only tool she has, and she decided to use it.
Perhaps you'd have preferred if she parachuted in with M16s and grenades, or used The Force β’οΈ "You *will* stop this genocide..."
comment in response to
post
I don't believe you're so naive? It's a (brave) effort to change the narrative.
comment in response to
post
It's publicity. An effort to shift the prevailing narrative.
comment in response to
post
You don't achieve success in anything without effort and failure.
And more pertinently, because of who it is, this is a failed effort that may have some measure of success in publicising what's going on.
comment in response to
post
Did you try, Paul?
comment in response to
post
It's going to be less surely
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
You'd still get some halfwits reversing into aunty fanny on her mobility scooter.
comment in response to
post
Could try 14.6mph?
comment in response to
post
Or, glass half empty, we're all too siloed, with few shared cultural / social interests in common? π¬
comment in response to
post
N
comment in response to
post
Meanwhile, the evidence for 20mph in places where people live their lives, grows and grows π€·πΌββοΈ
comment in response to
post
Exactly the argument a friend of mine uses. If you're not competent to keep a vehicle at 20, frankly you shouldn't be driving at all.
comment in response to
post
We're never going to convince everyone in every situation. As long as less motorists are driving at 30, and we continue to incentivise reduced speeds, then road safety should improve.
comment in response to
post
If the only question we ask at elections is "am I better off now?" we'll never get a politics that thinks long term; that makes sacrifices for great causes; or that calls some to pay more in solidarity with others.
We're citizens, not customers. The left, of all movts, needs to keep that idea alive
comment in response to
post
What a time to be alive
comment in response to
post
And is that rate normally 0 percent? 1 percent? 10 percent? Does the report include yoy changes historically?
comment in response to
post
What was the rate of change the year before and the year before that?
comment in response to
post
So dire predictions of 26% (144,103 children) leaving private schools were unfounded
Instead just 1.9% (11,000) left, which was even below the OBRs lowest forecast
Due to the falling birth rate 59,600 left state schools
It's margin of error stuff
www.taxpayersalliance.com/analysis_vat...
comment in response to
post
This is good news for drug cartels considering what the products they make & supply do to people.