phoenixwb.bsky.social
Working against whiteness
How does one find a seat at the table fighting against 'the man' while embodying said 'man'?
68 posts
96 followers
314 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Fuck you. You don't even know the history of your own country
www.smithsonianmag.com/history/less...
comment in response to
post
Usually the Republican starts a war.
comment in response to
post
Try "trump says US importers will face 55% tax on Chinese imports"
comment in response to
post
Wouldn't it be easier just to head down to corporate headquarters and round up management? Easier, air conditioned, lots of arrests all at once, wait.
comment in response to
post
@governor.ca.gov
stop this.
comment in response to
post
Johnson's johnson just vibrated.
comment in response to
post
And they both lost.
comment in response to
post
I live here, and while the downtown is very "liberal" in a white, crystal gazing kind of way, the surrounding area is red. For many, it's a worrisome area to be queer
comment in response to
post
We're being governed by children.
comment in response to
post
Imagine folding to Stephen Miller.
comment in response to
post
I recognize those patches. BS Troop E04
comment in response to
post
If you've lost faith in democracy read The 1619 Project.
comment in response to
post
That old man was the most successful, consequential president in my lifetime.
comment in response to
post
In my drinking days I was assassinated countless times from local bars.
comment in response to
post
I'm not saying that very well, but that seems like the Crux of what Justice Jackson was getting at. If the EO is unconstitutional, why would anybody else have to sue to show that it's unconstitutional in their case? Thanks for all you do. I came to Blue Sky because you moved over here
comment in response to
post
I have no idea about the law but if a judge rules against the government in a specific case like this, does that mean the underlying executive order is unconstitutional altogether? Or does it mean only that the specific use of the EO with regards to that individual is unconstitutional.
comment in response to
post
I only protested the Vietnam War cause I couldn't get laid.
comment in response to
post
Looked at your tweets and wanted you to know i am on your "chronic pain's" side.
comment in response to
post
Wow. All that by 28. What an amazing man.
comment in response to
post
They are just 1 ridge away from me now. I'm 60 miles west by nw of Sacramento. Pretty amazing.
comment in response to
post
The Great Redemption do over.
comment in response to
post
Is that the BTK killer?
comment in response to
post
Sanders' legislative accomplishment in 20+ years
www.congress.gov/member/berni...
comment in response to
post
Excellent book as well.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
And she just looks evil.
comment in response to
post
Why are they all white?
comment in response to
post
They gotta keep it dumb for the 60% of white people who eat his shit up.
comment in response to
post
It doesn't raise up that high.
comment in response to
post
Zelensky leaving the White House.
comment in response to
post
The Department of Education just put out a document that claims white people are being subjected to racism. This would be a perfect spot for white people to step up. Why would/should Black people need to lift a finger to make that happen?
comment in response to
post
"Government cost cutting" is just more sane washing. This certainly is not that.