pishablunk79.bsky.social
641 posts
95 followers
91 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
This particular political party is quite comfortable with this outcome too eh? www.thetimes.com/us/american-...
comment in response to
post
So we can't increase minimum wage because it would hurt small businesses, but we can impost tariffs that obliterate them?
comment in response to
post
It's encouraging to read that some companies are still committed to DEI policies and activities, albeit using different terminology.
comment in response to
post
Guess the tariffs aren't fixing the fentanyl crisis...
comment in response to
post
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I want to see that memo! I want to see him figure this one out!
comment in response to
post
Maybe she should've listened to him speak on the campaign trail and in interviews. What he's doing is no surprise to those of us who did listen to him, painful as it was. And, Obama and Biden deported a lot of criminals, but people didn't want 'more of the same.' They got the change they wanted...
comment in response to
post
Majesty? I think he meant maggotry.
comment in response to
post
If he acknowledges it at all.
comment in response to
post
Wonder what diddy has on donald.
comment in response to
post
Wrong answer...of course we're all going to die at some point. We also use healthcare so we can function in our lives, in society, without pain and disability. Some use it so they can see, hear, walk, talk. And yes, we use it so we don't die prematurely, so we have a high quality of life. Fuck her!
comment in response to
post
Time to implement drug testing for all members of government.
comment in response to
post
Maybe if the executive branch brought back DEI, we'd have some folks who understand the constitution and how government works...
comment in response to
post
It's published on congress.gov: www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
It's not an easy read that's for sure, but we're not congress people. I'm willing to bet more lay people have read it than congress. They just vote along party lines...
comment in response to
post
He already submitted an appeal, go figure...
comment in response to
post
As will he.
comment in response to
post
I've read that it's likely the Senate will remove that. 🤞
comment in response to
post
Because the current congress majority is impotent 🥱
comment in response to
post
If they're right wing enough, they'll vote for a man, esp if this admin keeps up with their misogynistic and anti-DEI rhetoric. Not that I agree that gender matters, but in this case, it could work to our advantage.
comment in response to
post
Why don't we post the Bill of Rights?
comment in response to
post
Gee, this would never have happened if Harris had been president...
comment in response to
post
Donald broke all his campaign promises (except for pardoning J6 criminals). He can screw his campaign donors the way he's screwing the rest of us. Is it about the money? Or is he showing that big biz is immune? I'm sick of corporations over citizens.
comment in response to
post
73% of Americans support cutting waste. Few support doge or how musk went about it. He's confusing the two. And yes, musk not only failed, but cost us more.
comment in response to
post
Will they even be allowed in? I'm sure some serious vetting will be undertaken. He'll crush the dreams of many athletes.
comment in response to
post
91% and they'd still be billion/millionaires.
comment in response to
post
If only we had a President who was going to make price gouging illegal...
comment in response to
post
Such a timely read. Trump’s migrant policies aren’t just cruel. They’re purposeful.
comment in response to
post
From kind of a sick viewpoint, he's bringing about world peace. But like you said, without us.
comment in response to
post
robertreich.substack.com/p/the-hidden...
comment in response to
post
Don't forget tax exemptions on gun silencers and tanning beds.
comment in response to
post
Also, Afrikaners...
comment in response to
post
Anytime a reporter asks this admin about something negative they've done in the recent past, their answer is they're looking forward. So either stop focusing on the past, or take responsibility for their own actions already. Better yet, focus on fixing the mess they're creating now!
comment in response to
post
But not a gift to donald personally, right?
comment in response to
post
'They plan to use the plane as Air Force One and then transfer it to Trump’s library after his term ends.' I thought it was a gift to the US and not to donald personally. Shouldn't the next president have access to it, assuming anyone in their right mind would use it?
comment in response to
post
If noem thinks habeas corpus is the gov't legally removing people, why are they fighting to get rid of it? Maybe the question should've been 'what is plasticus corpus?' She would know that, now wouldn't she?
comment in response to
post
"The Civil Rights Division exists to enforce civil rights laws that protect all Americans," Young (former division attorney)
Read: all Americans
"... ensure that our nation's civil rights laws benefit all Americans, ..." Dhillon (new division head)
Read: white, Christian Americans
comment in response to
post
Nope. And I don't believe Ivana Trump fell down a flight of stairs either.
comment in response to
post
My same thought. I thought I misunderstood that.
comment in response to
post
HE FUCKING WON...why is he wasting taxpayer dollars to rant?
comment in response to
post
Swift is a self-made billionaire. You, donald, inherited your money and can't even sustain a successful business.