qdpb.bsky.social
68 posts
10 followers
81 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
The writing wasn’t on the wall. It just conveniently feels so after the fact. He won by an extremely small margin.
comment in response to
post
But it isn’t! And it never will be: the experience of other countries shows that future is contactless. London charges 7 non-refundable pounds for an Oyster card now to discourage people from using it.
comment in response to
post
There isn’t a card like this, at least not in the NY metro region. Contactless is functionally equivalent except
For very niche cases.
comment in response to
post
Have fun!
comment in response to
post
Give me an example from this year?
comment in response to
post
I’m all for being respectful of people who passed away, but what fighting?
comment in response to
post
The next administration should aggressively prosecute parents for not vaccinating. Then it will get covered on OANN and might be the only way to pierce their idiotic bubble.
comment in response to
post
They provide the money that he receives.
comment in response to
post
He should go on, like, Kimmel and do it. Build him a Resolute desk and all. Make it a daily segment.
comment in response to
post
This is all good, but why are you doing this in the responses for voter outreach? Perhaps if you stuck to doing doomerism in doomerism spaces, there would be fewer stupid and oblivious people?
comment in response to
post
Even this reply is more appropriate than the doomerism, in my opinion
comment in response to
post
Why are you focused on these things in responses to voting organization?
comment in response to
post
Doesn’t it still make sense to get out the vote?
comment in response to
post
He won’t get this sort of free assisted healthcare anywhere else, so he’s probably never stepping down voluntarily.
comment in response to
post
This is absolutely deranged. Should Kerry have withdrawn when Swift Boat came out? Should Obama have withdrawn when “You didn’t build that” come out? You can’t just withdraw when something happens and right-wing propaganda blows it out of proportion.
comment in response to
post
Enjoy your delusions.
comment in response to
post
And this nuance will be very well understood, you don’t have to look further than this thread of sophisticated(!) political observers who didn’t perceive it that way yo be convinced that a broader Dem coalition will get it instantly
comment in response to
post
It is pretty impressive that he got into that studio without a car, though. Even if he's wrong about not being able to drive.
comment in response to
post
It's a word for people who think they're sooo smart, but they're just absolute insufferable morons, which is how this guy ended up voting the way he voted.
comment in response to
post
Yes, if you were to ignore the MAJORITY of the state, then the state would look very different.
comment in response to
post
What is so insane is that we are not even inconveniencing extremely rich here. $9 is nothing to them, and they can drive places faster. We're just inconveniencing people who don't think not sitting in traffic is worth $9 -- people who are just clearly wrong.
comment in response to
post
Guaranteed the driver is not paying for the parking in this spot either, they have 3 "No Standing - Day/Time Limits" this year already.
comment in response to
post
Can you speed through a school zone or block crosswalks and hydrants in a 7 train though? It's imperative this driver has a place to park.
comment in response to
post
It's ok to admit you're wrong and move on.
comment in response to
post
I mean if we can just redefine terms then any statement can be true.
comment in response to
post
Was United States backing Hitler domestically? Why was it meaningful?
And still keen to learn what other United States we have that isn’t represented by the government.
comment in response to
post
What is it then? Is there “United States” that is not the “US government”? Is it relevant for the purpose of foreign policy?
comment in response to
post
Sorry to be pedantic, but the screenshot is an AI summary, right? Is it correct?
comment in response to
post
I'm a NY voter, and I'm also against the genocide of Palestinians. Idk, doesn't seem too controversial.
comment in response to
post
But also they’re not representing the company in this video. It’s just a bunch of people goofing off likely on a lunch break? Would be tough to find them in violation of any policy.
comment in response to
post
She just got a fresh 6 year term, unfortunately. So not until 2030; but most definitely then.
comment in response to
post
"I'm no fan of cops but". Hell yeah.
comment in response to
post
What makes you say this about a person you don't know who by all accounts is a decent human?
comment in response to
post
So a little confused: how does this make Romanians good guys?
comment in response to
post
This is great, but I wish they randomized the candidates. I bet many people will rank in this order, and Adams is probably the worst of the four.
comment in response to
post
I think ineffective ads should not be purchased on a blanket basis too. Maybe you’re reading too much into it?
comment in response to
post
I don't know if anyone suggested this?
comment in response to
post
She's just saying it because we just had an election that cost us $1b and got a lot of very wrong consultants very rich through the TV ad buying.
comment in response to
post
It should be, but wouldn't be: Dem leadership doesn't want to do any work until they can run ads on TV next summer, and the press doesn't really have any staff to write about real (Republican) fuck-ups, so they all would've quickly moved on to whatever is the current problem with the American left
comment in response to
post
Yeah man if the Voter ID they pass won’t be disenfranchising, it won’t disenfranchise much. But they will pass a different one, they really care about disenfranchising!
comment in response to
post
So you just making things up?
comment in response to
post
Or possibly he is just highlighting the part of her record that made her a target of the unlawful ICE effort
comment in response to
post
What the article seems to suggest is that while she was raised a Republican, she developed a different set of views in college and went to work for a very non-Republican organization. But the article implies this, so I was hoping for a more direct source that contradicted it?
comment in response to
post
And could you highlight the part that says she was a Republican in college?
comment in response to
post
The law allows the government to attempt to strip the permanent residency based on some crimes, and Robert seems to think it ok to not only do it to someone based on a 20+ year old offence, but also to detain her in a concentration camp while the case is pending
comment in response to
post
Can you link to a source?
comment in response to
post
Can you point to a source that confirms that she was a Republican in college? All I could find is she grew up in a Republican family.
I’ll also add that Musk has a trans daughter, so it doesn’t quite work like that, but I don’t know the actual record.
comment in response to
post
Oh most definitely.
comment in response to
post
Good on him on doing all this, but you absolutely don’t have to hand it to him, ok?
comment in response to
post
I’m basing this on knowing who he is. You know he has been a public figure for a few decades, right? There’s a reason his phone number was so readily available to whatever goon added him to the chat.