randompersonfire.bsky.social
I talk about fire/life safety, politics, Disney, and more. Left-leaning, proudly non-partisan, anti-NRA, anti-war, a non-driver, and a Masshole.
740 posts
57 followers
37 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
PS: If you're curious, someone recently posted the EPCOT Building Code.
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
Here's the code, if you're curious: bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
And speaking of a different kind of code... here's the Reedy Creek Improvement District's soon-to-be-defunct EPCOT Building Code.
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
Off topic but I think you might find this interesting.
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
Speaking of building codes, you may find this interesting:
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
Off-topic but you may be interested in this: someone recently posted the EPCOT Building Code.
archive.org/details/EPCO...
comment in response to
post
Just curious have you done any research on the statutes that allow all these entities (city/town/university/school district/etc.) to have their own police forces? I'm wondering if some of these are being created based on assumptions of implied authority (e.g. "do anything in connection with").
comment in response to
post
Healthcare... for the profits of the military-industrial complex? (That's what the video shows.)
comment in response to
post
I've long believed that a lot of police forces in this country can and should be abolished, for many reasons. There are way too many law enforcement agencies (federal, state, local, and private) in the US.
comment in response to
post
Or the Israeli flag, for that matter.
comment in response to
post
It'll certainly make it easier to build things like transit and housing - no wonder there's bipartisan support.
bsky.app/profile/muse...
comment in response to
post
Fun fact: Waymo is owned by Google which also owns reCAPTCHA. (Ever wondered why reCAPTCHA shows challenges based off of images from Google Street View?)
comment in response to
post
She claims to be pro-life "at every stage". (Of course, in many ways, the right isn't really pro-life - especially after birth.)
www.ernst.senate.gov/priorities/p...
comment in response to
post
There are some Republicans who wanted to bomb Agrabah, so perhaps those same people want to do that?
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015...
comment in response to
post
Of course this "badges for bucks" case had something to do with a certain federal law. (As a states' rights zealot, I think that law violates the 10th Amendment.)
www.newsweek.com/badge-factor...
comment in response to
post
If he imposes tariffs on Apple and only Apple, I'm quite certain Apple would sue.
comment in response to
post
The "there will always be sufficient air" part reminds me of how Los Angeles seemingly mandated a notice that said "There is little danger of running out of air or of this elevator dropping uncontrollably."
x.com/veltman/stat...
comment in response to
post
The Abschiebe-Gestapo.
comment in response to
post
This reminds me of the ridiculous municipal borders in Chicagoland.
comment in response to
post
Don't forget all the sanctions (e.g. the Cuba sanctions that Trump reinstated).
comment in response to
post
This makes me wonder if anyone has tried to apply for variances to use EN/ISO elevators. (This may be more feasible in some states than others. For instance, Massachusetts allows statewide "product approval" variances.)
comment in response to
post
Here's an idea that would be an important part of making both of those things (and more) possible. (Note that in many states, elevators are regulated separately from building codes.)
comment in response to
post
A standard referenced by the not-really-"International" Mechanical Code. (UL 60335-2-40)
comment in response to
post
This reminds me when a then-sitting member of Congress decided to blame mass shootings on... porn in grocery stores. (Politicians make up a lot of silly excuses for mass shootings, but this one's just baffling.)
theweek.com/speedreads/7...
comment in response to
post
Missouri used to hate cooperating with federal law enforcement. (oh right... they only care about that when it's something the Republican Party hates.)
www.stlpr.org/government-p...
comment in response to
post
Someone needs to tell Disney about this solution. (They have a *ton* of "plus-size" guests which causes delays on the buses.)
comment in response to
post
This is precisely why I think decreasing the amount of PDs (whether it be at universities, small towns, counties, etc. - there are so many great ideas of places to start!) is the best path towards fixing a lot of law enforcement-related problems in this country.
comment in response to
post
Seems like you might be interested in some of @jesspish.bsky.social's writing.
comment in response to
post
Don't forget the unions... correct me if I'm wrong but as far as I'm aware the teachers' unions in Europe weren't carrying out body bag stunts like what the DC teachers' union did. (mentioned here)
reason.com/2021/01/24/i...
comment in response to
post
The most obvious proof of this is Trump and the GOP's usual hatred for refugees - the double standard is so obvious.
comment in response to
post
Don't forget all the proliferation of various state/local departments - especially when compared to other countries whose total amount of law enforcement agencies is much, much, less.
comment in response to
post
In a lot of countries (and some states) this would be entirely impossible. (and that sheriff is the same one that refers to his jail as a "Marceno Motel" in an absurd publicity stunt.)
comment in response to
post
PS... did you hear of this bill? It clearly violates the Tenth Amendment in many ways. (and ironically, conflicts with Printz which was a decision the right used to love.)
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
comment in response to
post
Speaking of the IRS... it is funny and suspicious to see the Republicans go so quickly from "abolish the IRS [and the Department of Education and other federal agencies]" to "weaponize the IRS [and the Department of Education and other federal agencies]".
comment in response to
post
Mechanism:
Look at best practices/lessons learned from around the world.
Content:
1. Allow point-access blocks.
2. Allow the use of international (not just US-specific) reference standards for products/materials.
3. Be a performance-based code.
4. Be consistent with state law.
comment in response to
post
Just curious... where would something like this fit? High or low?
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
Arguably the best solution would be systemic change - breaking free from the IBC entirely. (there are benefits to doing so.)
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
Systemic change would arguably be the best way to truly fix this.
bsky.app/profile/rand...
comment in response to
post
The IAFF's sleaziness on this reminds me of their absurd nonsense fearmongering on another issue: single-stair apartment buildings.
(Despite what they claim, the "International Building Code" is a name about as accurate as "World Series" or "Alliance Defending Freedom".)
comment in response to
post
If something's merely defunded without actual reform, it's easy to conveniently refund it in the next annual budget cycle... and even if something gets defunded there's no guarantee that the feds won't reimburse it. (Yes, there's precedent for that sort of reimbursement.)
comment in response to
post
Massachusetts is widely regarded as one of the most innovative states in the US. I wonder how receptive they'd be to the idea of being a proving ground for ditching the IBC entirely and writing an all-new, from-the-ground-up, performance-based building code.
comment in response to
post
You've hit the nail on the head as to why I think it's critical to reduce the number of LE agencies - something that a lot of people including other LE reform advocates seem to gloss over.
comment in response to
post
How about “kidnapped by the Abschiebe-Gestapo”?
(“Abschiebung” is German for deportation.)
comment in response to
post
There is litigation (including from at least one conservative legal group) seeking to stop the use of IEEPA to impose tariffs. (There's a very compelling argument that IEEPA doesn't authorize tariffs at all.)
comment in response to
post
Many (most?) states, CA included, regulate elevators separately from building codes, and these states would be great opportunities for reform irrespective of what ICC does.
If you're asking about LA city's exemption, that exists because the city's elevator inspections predate the state doing so.
comment in response to
post
This is an excellent idea. Many states, not just CA, regulate elevators separately from the building code.
There is one odd quirk: Los Angeles city is exempt from the statewide elevator regulations. (There are several ways in which that could be addressed, with different risks of opposition.)
comment in response to
post
For the FHA regulations those are separate from ICC's codes but there's two ways to submit a deregulation idea for any federal agency (the 2nd one closes on May 12):
www.regulations.gov/deregulation
www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...