Profile avatar
randyhardy.bsky.social
151 posts 58 followers 31 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Yes, for Ghislaine Maxwell
comment in response to post
Senator, less than 12 hours ago, elon stated that he was responsible for getting trump elected, that there is evidence of trump being involved with epstein's crimes, and that THE SAME BILL YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT is going to bankrupt the country. It's not quite time to move on from this yet.
comment in response to post
Don't put in the newspaper that I took it "personal"
comment in response to post
Still too nice
comment in response to post
Isn't it a little misleading to conclude cutting foreign aid is popular when other polls suggest the average person believes foreign aid spend to be over 25x the actual number, and wants to "cut" it to 10x the actual number? www.brookings.edu/articles/wha...
comment in response to post
It's probably supposed to be a difficult job, but bizarre to me that the part bongo seems to highlight as most taxing is just, being in an office?
comment in response to post
Rubio did give answers. He sat in front of the senate and lied to your faces and said no one had died because of USAID cuts. It's right in the NPR article. So now what?
comment in response to post
Necessary for the thumbnails of the inevitable hundreds of "reaction videos" where MAGA creators will say Zelden is DESTROYING a WOKE DEM Senator here. and the social media feeds of thousands or millions will be populated solely by content presenting this exchange through that lens.
comment in response to post
Is it a good sign when you have to "...out of this" your own plan?
comment in response to post
Realistically, how much longer are judges going to continue deferring to the exec branch on specifics (initial order "declined to elaborate")? Couldn't he have set the 10/15 day rule right away and saved these poor souls a cross-globe plane ride to a war zone?
comment in response to post
What does the "roam the countryside" line even mean?
comment in response to post
I think there is a fundamental divide in this country between people who 1. hear the cadence and tone typically associated with coherent speech here, and as a result actually perceive coherent speech; and who 2. hear a lack of coherent content, and as a result do not perceive coherent speech
comment in response to post
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but the lack of transparency isn't my biggest issue with the administrations inability to keep air traffic controls functioning at our State's busiest airport.
comment in response to post
Will be interesting to see how they claim invasion when Noem is in front of congress talking about how Trump miraculously closed the border and stopped the invasion as soon as he was inaugurated.
comment in response to post
Will there be any consequences for Marco Rubio, who enabled this by revoking her visa for political purposes?
comment in response to post
And after those three hours, I continued down the road to the chicken farmer, where I pet many chickens and smelled for virus. It was now 10pm and I had one unplucked dead chicken and one quart of milk with which to feed my family. America was finally healthy again!
comment in response to post
Still haven't recovered from the fact that Sauer said yes to the Seal Team 6 hypothetical and Roberts didn't even think that warranted a mention in the opinion.
comment in response to post
This is a reasonable interpretation, but I think there's at least an equal chance that he really does not know the tattoo is photoshopped. I think savvy internet users vastly overestimate the average person's ability to tell real from cartoon-level fake photo/video.
comment in response to post
If only this was a quantifiable measure that he could actually look into before coming on TV to tell us what he believes it to be
comment in response to post
Al Gore is actually much more impassioned: youtu.be/IrJPfGOTjd0?...
comment in response to post
Great response from Dana
comment in response to post
Have you seen any evidence that any actions being taken are motivated by a desire for "sensible reforms?"
comment in response to post
"It really has to be done from the office of the president." Has anyone asked him if he thinks Steve Witkoff is the president now?
comment in response to post
'9/11 is an inside job' is also too boring of a conspiracy theory compared to the stuff their followers actually believe. Trump was out there embracing Qanon and couldn't deny that democrats are satanic pedophiles.
comment in response to post
Reporter, hearing the most insane, hypocritical, dangerous, undiplomatic nonsense that directly enables Russia: "[nods along]"
comment in response to post
And so confident in her misinformedness that she went out of her way to attempt to CORRECT Sen. Warren!
comment in response to post
Can we start with just asking her to just specify exactly what she would 'use her voice' for, and what retaliation she's afraid of? We can read between the lines, but I guarantee a non-zero number of her voters hear this as her fearing having a communist set her tesla on fire or similar.
comment in response to post
The near total lack of accountability for the lies those leaders told us enabled the lies these leaders are telling us now. "Many of those" youtu.be/FGhGHxw0mSo?...
comment in response to post
"Can you believe it?"
comment in response to post
I hear it as a step towards arguing that crossing the border illegally is in itself human trafficking.
comment in response to post
That and the fact that the SC is apparently going to work diligently to craft orders that simply cannot be unambiguously violated. What does "facilitate" mean? What does "what they can" mean?
comment in response to post
I don't understand why people were acting like this SC order was a win. Only willing to say 'facilitate,' go out of their way to say the judge probably can't order 'effectuate,' fall all over themselves to order deference to the exec, and orders exec only to share "what it can."
comment in response to post
Just like when you get pulled over for speeding (after SCOTUS says 9-0 you need to slow down), and the friendly policeman lets you continue speeding and asks you to send him a letter in a few days explaining whether you should get a ticket. Standard procedure.
comment in response to post
Doesn't this exchange suggest that there will be no consequences when the daily updates lack any substance? [DOJ]: ... court deadlines not practicable Judge: Then you can tell the public that every day in status updates
comment in response to post
Sen. Schumer says "History will remember April 9, 2025 as America’s actual liberation day" because Trump rescinded some tariffs yesterday. Do you agree, or do we need new Senate leadership?
comment in response to post
Senator, couldn't congress undo the tariffs immediately? Can you introduce that legislation and force a vote? At least make all the Rs in congress own this too.
comment in response to post
They even wore red for the occasion
comment in response to post
I can't help think that leaving it at "for whatever reason," while abundantly clear to those who already know, goes right over the heads of those who need to know.
comment in response to post
Neguse is great. We haven't seen enough of him lately.
comment in response to post
So the ones pushing the (big) lie and financing the thing are the actual bad guys who need to be punished brutally? Imagine how bad it would look if someone could find musk coming out vehemently against such a theory of liability in the very recent past...
comment in response to post
Firing 10,000 important employees = "sweeping overhaul" to you? And your concerns would be addressed if we just got someone with more firing ability and expertise to do the firing?
comment in response to post
The question didn't even specify "died." Reports came out about them being missing yesterday. At least 24 hours and he still hasn't been briefed!