reactiveashley.bsky.social
Entrepreneur, engineer, and cat mum. 100% wind-powered. Too well read to be a good lawyer. Ex-Alphabet, one of the fiercest advocates.
(I always follow back if you follow me and interact with my 🏳️‍⚧️ rights post)
2,944 posts
2,223 followers
1,139 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Agree!!!
comment in response to
post
Where this from?
comment in response to
post
3/ This actually greatly limited my options too. Well, the Supreme Court wanted to be seen as less activist... so that's the law.
comment in response to
post
If you are a business, service provider or venue who is responding, please make sure your make your response public or share it with @transactualuk.bsky.social so that we can hold the EHRC to account.
For everyone else, ask your MP to demand the EHRC show their working! bsky.app/profile/phil...
comment in response to
post
2/ “Failing” to explain future case law in past guidance is not an omission, nor can past guidance be said to present a misleading picture of the future legal position.
Neither Gillick (1986) nor A v Home Secretary (2021) provides any support for such a misguided challenge.
comment in response to
post
It’s complicated. 🙂
comment in response to
post
Yes. I noticed that too. And Ben Cooper has been repeating the same thing too.
comment in response to
post
That’s far-fetched. Every case in England and Wales, as well as in Scotland, decided after FWS 1 has rejected the reasoning of the Inner House.
comment in response to
post
I believe it’s James Goudie KC, and I’ve noticed that he has made a few notable concessions on behalf of the EHRC. 🤔
comment in response to
post
🤣🍄‍🟫
comment in response to
post
"LGBT+ and transgender"
Riiiiight. I see what you did there.
Frankly this is a low priority for me anyway. Sort out the human rights violations from the government, EHRC and the NHS. Then sort out the daily incitement to genocide in the press.
comment in response to
post
2/ It is fair to say that the EHRC is now in a difficult position, and I doubt it will be able to provide a meaningful response.
comment in response to
post
Also a delay tactics.
comment in response to
post
Afaik, they copied and pasted from their response to the Good Law Project despite our grounds are different. Their in-house solicitor is bad, IMHO.
comment in response to
post
Then typo
comment in response to
post
Tay is now sharing her “humiliating” experience to shed light on what she believes is discrimination against hidden disabilities and the LGBTQ community. M&S have apologised to Tay and said that they have a “zero tolerance approach to discrimination” across their stores.
comment in response to
post
The epilepsy sufferer walked in to find a man urinating so left and rushed into the ladies. But as she waited for a cubicle, the same M&S staff was convinced she was “a boy” so refused to let her use the ladies and sent her back to the disabled loos, can called her “him” to a member of the public.