Profile avatar
richsulley.bsky.social
Snr Research Fellow in Sustainability Policy. The Grantham Centre for Sustainable Futures. https://substack.com/@richsulley Sustainability, bikes, birds, grumpiness
152 posts 333 followers 634 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
A functioning public transport system and safe segregated routes for pedestrians and cyclists will never look as sexy and attract the tech bro dollars, but they will help fix the climate and societal problems that we face now in a way chasing a techno-solution never will.
comment in response to post
Autonomous vehicles, like EVs and AI, seem to excite politicians and policy makers without them ever fully communicating why, it looks like it's just the thrill of the new and not wanting to appear behind the curve.
comment in response to post
Safety is often quoted as the reason, along with congestion. But we know the answer to both these is to have fewer cars on the road and more use of public transport and active travel.
comment in response to post
I'd suggest the only reason a company like Uber would be interested is that it gives them the ability to remove the costly driver from the car. I'd suggest the only reason a company like Uber would be interested is that it gives them the ability to remove the costly driver from the car.
comment in response to post
The DfT are making claims about economic benefit with claims of a potential "38k jobs and an industry worth ยฃ42bn by 2035", but where will these jobs come from and who will see the benefit?
comment in response to post
The latest is the news that Uber will be trialling driverless taxis in London next year, in advance of a proposed rollout in 2027 on the back of the Autonomous Vehicles Act
comment in response to post
Whilst we might take an activist approach to some things, we are not the radical flank, that space belongs to others, and they influence us in our work as much as I hope we can inform them. In a world of binaries, is there space for nuance?
comment in response to post
In doing this we ask ourselves should we be working with Oil & Gas giants, Petrochemicals, Energy? Are we fools to think we can influence these orgs directly? Itโ€™s a tough decision, I think it's on us to make those decisions openly and transparently. But recognising it may come with criticism.
comment in response to post
Tony was honest and pragmatic and to paraphrase said it is down to us to investigate solutions, as neutrally as we can, as widely as we can, and if we find out things wonโ€™t work and are daft, we say so. (see our recent work on airport expansion) We then present this evidence to policy makers.
comment in response to post
At @granthamcsf.bsky.social @festofdebate.bsky.social event on the future for plastics these questions were raised again, โ€œ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜บ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต?โ€, โ€œ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ถ๐˜ฑ ๐˜ข ๐˜ง๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฑ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ?โ€, โ€œ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ?โ€
comment in response to post
Many pounced on this as evidence that this technology would never work and was a waste of human talent and resources, and simply a way for the fossil fuel industries to greenwash. A few recognised that only through trial and failure do we ever find success.(bsky.app/profile/davi...)
comment in response to post
Recently in the news was the story of Climeworks project in Iceland and its failure to scale up direct air capture at the rate that even offset its own operational emissions.
comment in response to post
Within the Sustainability Community we are often guilty of demonising technologies or industries, pre-judging outcomes, and questioning motives. There is a value in scepticism, if the history has taught us nothing else it should be not to trust the motives of corporations.
comment in response to post
Thereโ€™s been a recent focus in the US, picking and choosing research projects and highlighting the โ€œwasteโ€ of public money they represent, often with no context as to how they add to the web of knowledge, where the funding originates and why it was chosen to be funded in the first place.
comment in response to post
To the outside observer, and often to me, doing things I donโ€™t understand, or donโ€™t agree with, or with partners I find distasteful.
comment in response to post
You do see a lot of people arriving on bicycles wearing recycled sea plastic glasses though. So it's not all bad ๐Ÿ˜‰
comment in response to post
You certainly don't.
comment in response to post
"it's more of a comment than a question......"
comment in response to post
Please come along to our @festofdebate.bsky.social event next week and see if this vision stacks up. We need people to come who can ask some challenging questions, putting the Debate back in the Festival.
comment in response to post
Politicians ignoring evidence is endemic: Clegg today on austerity impact. Starmer on immigration "damage". Coppard on airports positives.