ringobeagle.bsky.social
Drummer for The Beagles
Living in đšđđ«
Progressive Green Dog
192 posts
116 followers
177 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I did not say it was the most significant event in the history of the Middle East, you really need to learn how to read.
Itâs the most significant event in the current active conflict, given it has been used as a scapegoat to justify the actions of Israel since it happened.
comment in response to
post
All countries⊠Do you think all Russians should die because of Ukraine? Or that all Pakistani should die because their governments support terrorist in India?
Tell me you are 16 without telling me your are 16âŠ
comment in response to
post
Thanks, you might be able to get your head out of your ass now.
comment in response to
post
Thatâs your comeback?
Thatâs just sad.
comment in response to
post
Now I am a person with an opinion that canât be summed up in a plot of a super hero blockbuster.
There are innocent in every war, take your head out of your ass before you accuse all citizens of a country of supporting something and say they should die for it.
comment in response to
post
So we bomb them?
You people are fucking crazyâŠ
comment in response to
post
You donât agree with genocide, but you agree with Nuking Tel Aviv, what a stable genius⊠How would nuking Tel Aviv not be genocide?
Your capacity to evaluate yourself is sounding quite close to the Orange idiot.
comment in response to
post
If you actually believe that than you are too far from being argued against. You literally turned into them, but instead of hatting Palestinians you hate Israelis. Good job, you are now as morally wrong as the original perpetrators and you are proudly sharing it online. What a geniusâŠ
comment in response to
post
And since they say that you want to kill them? Seriously? How are you better than the other side that says âthey say they want to kill all Jews and eliminate Israelâ.
Like listen to your fucking self for a minute, youâve gone too far.
comment in response to
post
You are too far into an extreme for me to argue you out of it, have a good night. Letâs hope nothing bad happens, all of this has already gone to far since the October 8th attack.
comment in response to
post
You are not a serious person if you actually believe that. You are also too far into an extreme that I will not argue out of it, have a good night. Letâs hope nothing bad happens, this has all already gone too far.
comment in response to
post
Wishing for the death of millions of innocents does not make you morally superior, even if you donât agree with how they act.
comment in response to
post
Thanks! đ¶
comment in response to
post
The point is that we need ideias to create carbon sinks to reduce the CO2 in the atmosphere and this is a functional one. Once we reach net zero, we need to go net negative.
Another thing is the construction industry has high emissions, replacing some materials with wood would help reduce them.
comment in response to
post
Depends on how we treat the buildings and how we dispose of them, the point is if you donât leave the trees to rot it wonât lead to more CO2. We just need to be smart on how we dispose of them.
comment in response to
post
What bullshit? First I donât live in the US, second all rich countries give money as aid to poor countries, itâs been like that centuries. Are you only waking up now?
comment in response to
post
Depends on what you do with the cut trees. If you let them rot into coal or oil and than use that, of course itâs releasing more CO2 over time.
If you treat the wood and use it for construction, you can delay the over time release to a pretty long timeframe.
comment in response to
post
So the same as Tesla? Or most of his companies?
Although Tesla market cap is more than 20 times larger the USAID yearly budget.
comment in response to
post
So far it seems the government would make more money by investigating musk and his companies for tax fraud and market manipulation, than what ever he is doing.
Nothing he found is even close to being as shocking as the market manipulation he has been doing openly for years.
comment in response to
post
I didnât say itâs a lie, I said itâs a conflict of interest. A billionaire shouldnât decide what to cut, they are not very found of subsidizing the poor.
Tax fraud is a bigger problem, the US last year lost 73B$ to corporations and wealthy individuals avoiding taxes. Why isnât Elon looking at that?
comment in response to
post
Cutting trees is not so bad as long as you plant new ones to replace, you will get more carbon from the atmosphere than if you just left the tree there.
Itâs a good technique do accelerate CO2 sequestering, as old trees absorb CO2 slower than young growing trees.
comment in response to
post
Conflict of interest means nothing to you?
www.newsweek.com/usaid-elon-m...
comment in response to
post
@andrewmanganelli.bsky.social I mean this Garmin outage:
www.theverge.com/news/598233/...
comment in response to
post
For me itâs not just the audio but the whole vibe of the Open AI demos and presentations. Itâs always so awkward, tech companies have been doing things like this for a while, sometimes they are cringe, but OpenAI takes the awkward award.
comment in response to
post
This, I just spent 40 minutes trying to find Ellis đ„Č
comment in response to
post
Thanks anomander!
comment in response to
post
You argued with a lot of dogs before? Doesnât sound like sane behavior to me.
Auf! đ¶
comment in response to
post
Iâm pretty chill đ€·
Again youâre projecting, go back to the school yard.
comment in response to
post
Youâre the one having a tantrum đ€·
comment in response to
post
How am I the one who is easily triggered? Are you projecting?
Youâre the one that started to insult me for no reason and putting words in my comments that are not thereâŠ
comment in response to
post
People are allowed to comment and criticize whatever they want, thatâs literally what free speech is. If you donât like it get out of the internet, itâs pretty simple.
comment in response to
post
When did I say I donât respect the result? Wtf is wrong with you? People are entitled to criticize a politician and his policies, that doesnât mean you donât respect the resultâŠ
You spoke about censorship earlier, seems like youâre the one who would love to censor the critics.
comment in response to
post
Again I didnât say I agree with all EU policy, you also didnât ask me to list bad EU policy neither did I ask you to do the same.
You asked to point out bad Trump policies and thatâs what I did đ€·.
comment in response to
post
And this is just during the current administration, I really donât want to get into the first one. The list is too long.
comment in response to
post
He left the Paris accords, left the WHO, paused new offshore wind farms (cheaper power than âDrill baby drillâ), made federal workers get back to the office (will make them more unhappy with their work, leads to worse workers) and pardon ALL Jan6 rioters.
None of this is good for Americans.
comment in response to
post
Again Iâm not the one resorting to insult to answer to facts. Given most of your answers by now Iâm pretty sure youâre at most a troll 6 year old.
Have a good day.
comment in response to
post
Where did I try and stop your right for doing anything? Youâre the one insulting people, youâre also the one saying that you will ban me because I donât agree with you.
I fail to see how Iâm the one trying to silence someone.
comment in response to
post
Iâm not the one instantly resorting to insult to have a discussion online. Do you know what a troll is?
comment in response to
post
I did not say the EU is perfect, Trump policy is bad for most Americans thought, that part it pretty obvious.
Could you point me again to my hypocrisy though? I fail to see any other hypocrite in this chain except yourself.
comment in response to
post
You seem to lack basic reading comprehension.
comment in response to
post
âTax on Chinese EVs was created to help the European car companies compete with the Chinese ones. It was not about a trade war, China makes cars for cheaper so the tax was enforced so that European car manufacturers can compete.â
This was my first response, all facts no personal opinion
comment in response to
post
I did not say the EU doesnât do it, or that it is even smart what we do.
I just said the Mango Donaldo tariffs are fucking stupid and will hurt American consumers more than any tariff package the EU has enacted in my life time hurt the EU consumers.
comment in response to
post
Again where did I say any tariffs were good? Do you know how to read?
comment in response to
post
And I stand by it, the EU should not enact retaliatory tariffs to the Donaldo tariffs, since it will hurt EU consumers.
How does that make me a hypocrite cultist?
comment in response to
post
You literally called me specifically a hypocrite, so Iâm answering to that. You were literally assuming that I have an opinion that I donât.
comment in response to
post
Tariffs are anti consumer, doesnât matter who enacts them. The point is, is the sacrifice worth it for the bigger picture?
When we enacted sanctions on Russia, those made sense from an ideological standpoint.
EV tariffs are stupid.
Tariffs directed at a whole country are extremely stupid.
comment in response to
post
Iâm not a US citizen, so I donât get what you are asking.
I donât agree with the EU tariffs as they give a reason to the EU auto industry to keep not innovating.
I think Trump tariffs are an economic disaster, as US consumers will see an overall price increase on a huge amount of goods.