robthree.bsky.social
Dad, husband, airplane driver, gamer.
53 posts
37 followers
36 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Also my company needs new airplanes. A lot of new airplanes.
Both Boeing and Airbus have global supply chains.
comment in response to
post
I actually do NEED a new iPad.
It is my Electronic Flight Bag that contains all my Flight Manuals and navigation charts. Without it I, and every other airline pilot in this country, can not safely operate a jet to take y'all around the world, across the country, or down to grandma's.
comment in response to
post
Russians restored a Monarchy to France in 1814.
comment in response to
post
Do not tease me with this.
comment in response to
post
I’m an American, and I’m concerned about travel that takes me out of the US, only because getting back in is fraught with needless risk. Who knows what mood ICE is going to be in at the moment I return. And for sure after a long flight I’m not going to be at my best.
comment in response to
post
DC, April 5th. Be there! (Or find/start your local protest.)
handsoff2025.com
www.fiftyfifty.one
Pass it along!
comment in response to
post
With 24 new Senators, roughly 40 members of the House of Representatives, (and thus 64 electoral votes) the GOP would be defunct.
And the Guy would probably end up in prison.
comment in response to
post
The Shad medical history is not relevant to your thesis.
Stay on topic.
comment in response to
post
And none of that supports your assertion that the President decides where to sell US petroleum.
comment in response to
post
OPEC was not becoming important in the late 70a. Its dominance was established in the early 70s when they embargoed oil to the west in response to the Yom Kippur war.
comment in response to
post
The details of the Shahs medical history are irrelevant, and in no way support your assertion that he was in charge of opec in the late 70s.
comment in response to
post
You are all over the place. Once again, the document you posted doesn’t say what you say it does.
comment in response to
post
apnews.com/article/bide...
comment in response to
post
In the meantime, here is an article that says the US did increase exports to the EU - in 2022.
comment in response to
post
You're yelling again.
If he did, you're going to have to do better to prove it, because the screencap you posted doesn't back up your claim.
comment in response to
post
Duuuuude. Stop. Iran embargoed the US because they had a revolution and Carter allowed the ex-shah in for cancer treatments.
Then the hostage thing. It was on the news. Every day. For 444 days.
Opec was formed in 1960. Not '79.
comment in response to
post
не веди себя так глупо
comment in response to
post
"The pause will not immediately affect U.S. supplies to Europe or Asia, Granholm said, since seven LNG terminals are currently in operation, with several more expected to come online in the next few years."
comment in response to
post
"Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said the pause will not affect already authorized export projects and noted that U.S. gas exports reached record highs last year."
comment in response to
post
"The current economic and environmental analyses the Energy Department uses to evaluate LNG projects don’t adequately account for potential cost hikes for American consumers and manufacturers or the impact of greenhouse gas emissions, the White House said."
comment in response to
post
Well done, you found a source document.
What does it say? Does it ban sales to the EU?
No. No, it does not.
It pauses new construction of additional terminals.
Which is a very different thing, altogether, isn't it?
comment in response to
post
If you have a link to the source document that Biden signed, that "banned oil sales to the EU", post it.
But it doesn't exist. Because that would require Congressional approval.
comment in response to
post
The big oil shortage was during Nixon's term, not Carter's. And neither had anything to do with presidential decrees banning foreign commerce, both were due to OPEC supply constraints.
comment in response to
post
If you want to prove a point, you cite source documents, not a hearsay report without any corroboration in a partisan paper.
You don't YELL. And you don't insult.
Keystone is not the same thing at all. Not saying 'yes' to a construction waiver is not the same thing as banning sales entirely.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. That's not how America works.
Presidents don't have the authority to unilaterally control commerce.
You're a liar, tovarish.