romancroitor.bsky.social
Data Analyst 🔎📊, PhD in Biology 🦬🧬, Book Author 📘, NAFO fella 💙💛
I analyze propaganda content in a Soviet children's magazine (1924–1991) and share updates from my other research projects (taxonomy, systematics, evolution, paleobiology).
465 posts
2,014 followers
2,909 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
this is a big beautiful claim
comment in response to
post
yes
comment in response to
post
very sad...
comment in response to
post
Actually arts and humanities are extremely practical for training AI, as we discovered recently.
comment in response to
post
well, when Israel already did almost all job... it seems too late
comment in response to
post
Retractions often obscure the deeper issue—namely, unethical or low-quality editorial practices—& we should preserve this record as well. Ultimately, the most effective solution is structural: journals must engage experienced researchers as reviewers and compensate them professionally for their work
comment in response to
post
That approach risks creating bibliographic confusion. A better solution is to ensure that any dubious articles are clearly and permanently linked to the critical responses or rebuttals that follow.
comment in response to
post
Such articles must remain publicly available,&any identified issues should be addressed through a subsequent critical publication. Ultimately, it’s important to maintain a transparent record of researchers found to have published falsified data, in order to uphold scientific accountability&integrity
comment in response to
post
If certain publications are flawed, they should remain available, with subsequent critical responses or corrections published alongside them. This approach preserves the transparency of the scientific process and offers an honest reflection of a journal’s editorial standards over time.
comment in response to
post
good
comment in response to
post
That is something that I don't understand
comment in response to
post
YESSS!
comment in response to
post
successful in what? did they invent something? did they create something that everybody in the world want to buy it? Are there prestigious universities and scientific journals there? Are famous intellectuals, artists, writers, scientists there? where is the success?
comment in response to
post
sure not 🙄
comment in response to
post
This is a very wise decision of Vatican
comment in response to
post
you look nice
comment in response to
post
we have in Europe plenty of Russian 'refugees', no cyberattacks are needed.
comment in response to
post
Russians, for sure
comment in response to
post
no wonder. the last great depression was 80 years ago.
comment in response to
post
little stupid bourgeois...
comment in response to
post
Trump is a nazi
comment in response to
post
OK
comment in response to
post
This will go down in the history books as the moment when the United States turned its back on its friends and partners — just when it was their turn to show honor and loyalty!"
— Domagoj Franić, via conservator24.ro
comment in response to
post
The USA and its president are forcing Ukrainians to sign a business deal for minerals using mafia-style methods! ⬇️
comment in response to
post
The USA is boycotting military support for Ukraine, and the White House is looking for excuses from the Ukrainian president, even though efforts have been made to publicly humiliate him in front of the entire world! ⬇️
comment in response to
post
Ukraine is fighting for survival against the attacks of its neighbors. For three years, it has been fighting as a shield for all of Europe. ⬇️
comment in response to
post
United Kingdom: $50 billion;
Germany: $50 billion;
Canada: $18 billion;
Australia: $15 billion;
Norway: $2 billion;
Denmark: $2 billion.
TOTAL COST: $137 billion.
⬇️
comment in response to
post
I do agree
comment in response to
post
They act as Stalin's KGB
comment in response to
post
very accurate
comment in response to
post
there is a difference between Chinese and North Koreans
comment in response to
post
epic crash