rulpeterson.bsky.social
312 posts
403 followers
632 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
But...it's fucking granular!
comment in response to
post
If it was, you can bet it will elicit a form letter saying how Thrilled and Grateful she is to be your Senator.
comment in response to
post
Orange Man Trump he lie like a lizard
Like to see how HIS hair would fare in a blizzard!
comment in response to
post
So, whatever any academic in any discipline, has spent their life gaining a breadth and depth of understanding sufficient to teach it to others, they should *also* become expert in AI, its potential uses (???) and limitations, and spend a good portion of their time teaching that.
comment in response to
post
Sorry, not interested in reading about how Amy Klobuchar reproduces.
comment in response to
post
Their ironic bond is they each dream of having the other's fan base, and absolutely loathe their own. Elon is cursed with millions of sycophants who repeat his drivel thus showing him a mirror to his unfunniness, and Trump's worst nightmare is having to touch anyone who voted for him.
comment in response to
post
I remember 2010-2022 when Democrats gave Musk billions of dollars and de facto immunity for all crime and he repaid that generosity by bankrolling Trump.
We have already tried the be nice to Musk plan! It failed miserably
comment in response to
post
I think, for example, that attacking environmental regulations while mostly letting entrenched, monied interests off the hook, and not even addressing wealth inequality is immoral. Even if some of the "granular" things they argue have merit, I think the basis of their project is immoral. YMMV.
comment in response to
post
Huh. bsky.app/profile/bost...
comment in response to
post
KJP announcing this / writing this book reminds me of when George Wallace tearfully announced that he wasn't a racist anymore (except that Wallace got away with that, because some read it as a wink and others as permission to overlook his entire previous career).
comment in response to
post
That is beyond a generous interpretation of what he's saying here, which can be summarized as "principles are for suckers."
comment in response to
post
Their story is for extremely smug children.
comment in response to
post
Yes, perfect.
comment in response to
post
I like it. But could we make it "Li'l Stinkers"?
comment in response to
post
👍👍👍
comment in response to
post
Hey, what do you expect the New York Times to fill its pages with -- journalism?
comment in response to
post
We can bitch all day about how it's "unfair" but when one side spends four years calling the president's son a criminal every single day and Democratic leadership will at best post one tweet about the president pardoning anyone with a checkbook, this is not "the media's" fault.
comment in response to
post
No, no, no -- you don't understand: forget about having "plans," or an "agenda," or (God forbid) "principles." You have to get fuckin' granular, man. You know, GRANULAR.
comment in response to
post
"Zat's not my department," says Werner Von Braun
comment in response to
post
Really stolen valor to use that image for the cover. Come on, man!
comment in response to
post
The sixth launch of the Saturn V (1969) put Armstrong on the moon, just 12 years after Sputnik. This is nine straight failures of Starship.