rwebergrampy.bsky.social
(Not THAT Richard Weber.) Husband, dad, Grampy, retired IT professional and lawyer.
24 posts
22 followers
28 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
“If you lay a hand on law enforcement officers you will face the consequences.” (Some exceptions apply - mainly if it happened on Jan 6.)
comment in response to
post
I remember one case where British soldiers shot protesters. Somewhere in Boston in 1770, wasn’t it?
comment in response to
post
Dancing Fridays are the best! 👯
comment in response to
post
Thanks for the recommendation. I’m following now.
comment in response to
post
I thought people are supposed to become more conservative as they age. I’m 77, used to be fairly moderate, and suddenly I’m a Bernie Bro.
comment in response to
post
I appreciate Ms. Young’s perspective. I was a little surprised by how few people of color were at the Hands Off rally in our town. Her reasoning would go a long way to explain that.
comment in response to
post
Is this all part of the plan of tech billionaires to make JD Vance look good?
comment in response to
post
When we talk of neo-Nazism today maybe the memory of Katlyn and so many other innocent children will remind us that it is not a political philosophy but an evil horror.
comment in response to
post
I’m still an agnostic but God bless this man for standing up to power and standing for principles.
comment in response to
post
The photos that @auschwitzmemorial.bsky.social posts all recall the tragedy of Nazism. The photos of children like Michel are especially disturbing. And the most disturbing part is that it can happen again anywhere in the world.
comment in response to
post
So he may not be able to keep down the price of eggs, but he’s doing a helluva job keeping down stock prices.
comment in response to
post
“By fasting… we are also reflecting on the hold these corporations have over our lives”
That hits home as soon as I look at the first corporation on the list. Even if my fast doesn’t change the corporation, it may change my dependence on it.
comment in response to
post
Dumb question I guess but why would someone impersonate another account then basically just repost their material?
comment in response to
post
If Ds don’t broadcast this to the high heavens, they are missing a big opportunity.
comment in response to
post
Your eyes are captivating, Icek. You are remembered.
comment in response to
post
Two beautiful innocent souls. Still remembered.
comment in response to
post
A sobering summary of the Smith report with a whisper of hope for the “strong pro-democracy commitment of many of the American people and the institutions they have built”.
comment in response to
post
Really brightens a rainy day.
comment in response to
post
I wonder why Thomas et al wouldn’t agree that “the alleged evidentiary violations … can be addressed in the ordinary course of appeal”? Why special treatment for this particular felon?
comment in response to
post
Agnostic here, but OH MY GOD!
comment in response to
post
Good summary of the Senate report. Minor mentions in there of RBG, Rehnquist, Sotomayor, Gorsuch but nothing to compare to Thomas or Alito.
comment in response to
post
I respectfully disagree. Trump has already promised to pardon J6 criminals. They should go free while Joe would be visiting Hunter in prison?
comment in response to
post
Wouldn’t we all like lower taxes and lower debt? So why do I think that with these two in charge that the only efficiencies to be found will throw greater burdens on those least able to manage them?