Profile avatar
shiblatown.bsky.social
“He who saves his country does not violate any Law.” That’s me, then!
259 posts 62 followers 161 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
He’s definitely going to order goose-stepping and missile launchers for next year. Of course, by then, he might be wearing epaulets.
comment in response to post
He’s definitely going to order goose-stepping and missile launchers for next year. Of course, by then, he might be wearing epaulets.
comment in response to post
Pardon! Next!!!
comment in response to post
Wow! I had no idea.
comment in response to post
That Sheriff lives in a van down by the river.
comment in response to post
And Trump now knows that the degenerate hack generals who agreed to it will do even worse if asked.
comment in response to post
And Trump now knows that the degenerate hack generals who agreed to it will do even worse if asked.
comment in response to post
All you can learn, and then learn again because it never really sinks in, is that we are in a national psychosis. After Ft Bragg yesterday, I wonder whether anyone would even feel safe leaving the cult.
comment in response to post
All you can learn, and then learn again because it never really sinks in, is that we are in a national psychosis. After Ft Bragg yesterday, I wonder whether anyone would even feel safe leaving the cult.
comment in response to post
Conceivably, if ICE had gone to the Home Depot in windbreakers and without masks the protests might not have happened. The folks in Nebraska wouldn’t like military occupation. Why do they think that LA should?
comment in response to post
Conceivably, if ICE had gone to the Home Depot in windbreakers and without masks the protests might not have happened. The folks in Nebraska wouldn’t like military occupation. Why do they think that LA should?
comment in response to post
His supporters are incapable of learning anything.
comment in response to post
There it is. Fascism 101.
comment in response to post
Home run. The athleticism of contorting to get back onto the field was a big part of the accomplishment.
comment in response to post
The First Amendment says nothing about smelly riffraff who disagree with me.
comment in response to post
They’re not even good at fascism. At least Mussolini had some style and did some public works.
comment in response to post
I strenuously object!
comment in response to post
This thread is illuminating, I’ll give it that. Viva Che, I guess. Oh, wait, damn, was he an East coast Latino? Was he white? Is the OP? Am I? I had no idea this all mattered so much.
comment in response to post
Do you want to win the battle of Los Angeles, or the battle for America? The first is lost without the second. Build a popular movement that appeals to Atlanta, Milwaukee and Des Moines.
comment in response to post
Do you want to win the battle of Los Angeles, or the battle for America? The first is lost without the second. Build a popular movement that appeals to Atlanta, Milwaukee and Des Moines.
comment in response to post
Ad hominem aimed at those who are in full agreement with opposing the regime is still another example of how NOT to build a popular movement.
comment in response to post
Sorry, but this is not conducive to the creation of a popular movement. Also, it forfeits the US flag to the far right.
comment in response to post
Estas en el Brugal este noche?
comment in response to post
Regarding the library book scofflaw people, would it be okay to sadistically trample them with horses? Asking for a friend in the LAPD.
comment in response to post
Idiots with the Mexican flags. Learn how to build a popular movement, please!
comment in response to post
Not impressed. When it comes time to choose sides, they will almost to a person go with the fascists who pay them. We’ve seen this around the world plenty of times. More than that, they will follow orders to commit atrocities.
comment in response to post
Not impressed. When it comes time to choose sides, they will almost to a person go with the fascists who pay them. We’ve seen this around the world plenty of times. More than that, they will follow orders to commit atrocities.
comment in response to post
What Hegseth means, of course, is that if the Guard will not shoot protestors then he expects the Marines to do so.
comment in response to post
What Hegseth means, of course, is that if the Guard will not shoot protestors then he expects the Marines to do so.
comment in response to post
“Regime paramilitaries” is better.
comment in response to post
Another danger is that the CCP smokes its own pot and believes that an actual war would go just like in the movies. It has been a long time since China has projected ground forces.
comment in response to post
A turd with deep seeded principles.
comment in response to post
Russia chimes in.
comment in response to post
Musk will lose big if he tries to claim anticipatory breach. But, then, odds are that this will blow over and they’ll both go back to poisoning our well.
comment in response to post
Oops. I missed it.
comment in response to post
Anyone ever heard of early cancellation and budgetary allocation clauses?
comment in response to post
Remember when it was “communists” and “atheists” that were the preferred pejoratives of political scumbags? I’m thinking of happier days.