space4rent.bsky.social
I’m a guy who likes things.
124 posts
42 followers
37 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Meh. Conservatives have been confusing weather with climate for almost 50 years now. Nothing new here.
comment in response to
post
I’m don’t think that failing to support name changes you don’t personally agree with is the best play here but whatevs. I mean, you’re literally using their justification for deadnaming is all.
comment in response to
post
A thing being remarkable and a thing being predictable are *not* mutually exclusive…. You can predict when Old Faithful will erupt; it’s still remarkable.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Saying that education should be in sync with government policy is a pretty jarring thing to hear…
comment in response to
post
What does the age of her spouse have to do with anything?
comment in response to
post
When Dunning-Kruger governs
comment in response to
post
You = train wreck.
Later.
comment in response to
post
There were plenty of reasons to enter the war slowly even if you can’t wrap your head around them. They exist, they *are* out there lol. Step outta that bubble and maybe read something written by an actual historian on the matter. Also, I never said the “us won the war” or any other nonsense.
comment in response to
post
Excuses? You spelled “reasons” incorrectly, even if you don’t like them lol. Tell me you forgot the lessons the US learned from WWI without telling me you forgot the lessons the US learned from WWI.
Unless you never actually knew them to forget, I suppose.
comment in response to
post
Well, during WWII which is a pretty good example given the topic at hand.
comment in response to
post
So you don’t think we were “covertly” moving equipment and munitions prior to the signing of the bill?
Further, do you understand the reasons why the US embraced isolationism after WWI? (yes, I know we did prior to WWI as well but it got much stronger after)
comment in response to
post
You think Lend-Lease happened *after* Pearl Harbor? Further, you think we weren’t assisting the Allies in any meaningful sense from March ‘41 when Lend-Lease was signed in Congress
comment in response to
post
I happen to know FOR A FACT that he’s not a real doctor.
comment in response to
post
That’s a strong dose of “it was bad for me so it should be bad for you” right there.
comment in response to
post
It’s a feature, not a bug.
comment in response to
post
That’s pretty fucked up to music.
comment in response to
post
Run DMC, Raising Hell
comment in response to
post
Good people do.
comment in response to
post
Shit. That just makes sense. I’m… I’m sorry I came off as so aggressive. My bad.
comment in response to
post
People who have never heard of Bretton Woods.
comment in response to
post
Joke’s on you! She doesn’t think.
comment in response to
post
Because it’s a mass of incandescent gas. Duh.
comment in response to
post
It’s fun watching Hitch find new and exciting ways to manufacture runs, plus Skubs is pitching tomorrow!
comment in response to
post
But if he doesn’t help the 9/11-funding Saudis sportswash a few million bucks, who will?
comment in response to
post
Dude, I never said anything near that. I asked him to define a word he used. There’s literally thousands of metrics to determine how “great” something is; I had no idea it would trigger people to be asked that lol.
comment in response to
post
Man, you get a bit pissy when someone merely asks you to elaborate on your statement. Geez, it’s almost like you realize how fucking idiotic you sound.
comment in response to
post
Please objectively define “great”.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, you seemed to have missed my point. Best of luck with that.
comment in response to
post
In 1990, *most* big titles launched at $50 (I know some were more). $50 in 1990 is just a bit over $120 today so at least I can see where the $120 came from, but $200? Eff that noise.
comment in response to
post
1- no, we don’t have a national language.
2- sure. Cool with us.
3- umm, sure but you won’t like how that plays out…
4- does that include corporate welfare too?
comment in response to
post
So… she *wants* the media to fact check her claims then?
comment in response to
post
Says the guy barred from running charities in the state of New York because he was scamming children…
comment in response to
post
Yeah but it needs to be *different* jank. Don’t bring that Witcher 3 jank.
comment in response to
post
Fool me harder… daddy.
comment in response to
post
I figured you’d enjoy this:
comment in response to
post
And *you* called *me* arrogant. Huh. Either way, congrats on a good game/tournament.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
So my meme is arrogant yet you have nothing to say over me being told to “suck it”. Huh. Imagine that. Maybe you are the one missing point…
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Man, he’s *soooooooooo* close to actually getting it, too.
comment in response to
post
Thank goodness it’s a team sports, and not an individual endeavor, huh?
comment in response to
post
You call people names when you’re *not* mad at them? Again, this speaks volumes about you, not me. Clown, indeed…
comment in response to
post
Really, it’s not ok. You are quite literally judging someone because they root for the national team from their country. Think about that. You are mad at me because I root for Team USA and am proud of our win yesterday. Your inability to divorce sports from politics is *your* issue, not mine.
comment in response to
post
Odd. You named games/tournaments where Canada *clearly* viewed the US as a rival… but then claim it’s a one way thing that Canada doesn’t care about. Again… odd…
Either way, it was some great hockey and I hope Canada makes the final on Thursday. Hopefully, the rematch will be as good.
comment in response to
post
Imagine how full of yourself you have to be to judge a person based upon how they feel about a hockey game. This speaks volumes about you and none of it good, you judgmental, sanctimonious, sad soul, you.
comment in response to
post
*real
comment in response to
post
No, the Team Canada vs Team USA thing has been a teal rivalry most of my life. Do you not remember the 1996 WC?