spenser-q.bsky.social
16 posts
7 followers
9 following
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I've had different nightmares in my life. Not having one of them last night doesn't mean I didn't have a different one.
Not for you?
comment in response to
post
Also a life long Bears fan (now 53), and I have never seen anything like the complete situational incompetence shown by Eberflus. Nothing even close.
That's not to say I think they'll actually hire a good coach. There's hope for that, but even "less terrible" would be good.
comment in response to
post
At last our long Chicago Bears nightmare is over.
comment in response to
post
It's gotta be that they're afraid teams will game the system. Maybe something like watering the infield if you've got a ground ball pitcher, or maybe something more like: "oops, our boundary cam just went out unexpectedly, so the visiting team can't use it." Maybe other similar examples.
comment in response to
post
Looks like some good-a** hummus, too.
comment in response to
post
Earned you a follow.
Also: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
comment in response to
post
that random citizens are posting to YouTube?
It really goes back to the conspiracy-conspiracy mindset: I think "there's something suspicious" so "prove that I'm wrong that voter fraud happened."
No. Just no.
comment in response to
post
allegedly-fraudulent votes tallied in places in which the Democratic party is in power and effectively controls all vote counting? If so, then what is the plausible explanation for why they would participate in the conspiracy -- or why they would somehow fail to recognize signs of vote fraud ...
comment in response to
post
the fact that different states' voting systems are separate, and you'd have to account for how each separately was manipulated.
And you'd also have to run through other possible, but easily-recognized, difficulties with the vote-fraud hypothesis. For instance, were some of these ...
comment in response to
post
Perhaps more importantly, this has all the hallmarks of conspiracy-theorizing: assert that something is "suspicious" and demand that the world "prove me wrong."
No. You come up with a plausible scenario, based on evidence, in which all of this could have occurred -- despite, for instance, ...
comment in response to
post
No, it's junk -- disproven in this post. Short answer: there is no glut of "bullet ballots," just the appearance of one because of the typical, and totally normal, difference in the *rate* at which presidential and non-presidential ballots are counted. 1/2
www.dailykos.com/stories/2024...
comment in response to
post
When I saw that live I said, "I think that's the best tackle by a punter I've ever seen."
Now I know. Aussie.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, this is dumb.
"Something stinks" is not an argument. It's not evidence. It's nothing at all except the kind of thing conspiracy theorists say to pretend something happened. And because "something stinks" needs no evidence, it can also never be disproven.
Really bad.
comment in response to
post
Yes, more dogs, please. This is my boy, Cooper.
comment in response to
post
If it's not staged, and Mike has actually been training seriously, then he will.