Profile avatar
ssgtmullitard.bsky.social
Former SSgt in the USAF. I've worked in QA for Fitbit, Amazon, Canon, Intel, and Google. Disabled veteran. The "Hey folks, " skeets are informational.
1,474 posts 7,564 followers 8,068 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Imagine a family sues to stop a dangerous chemical plant expansion near their home. They’d be told: “Pay up first.” Even if they’re right, they can’t get the court’s help without cash. It’s a paywall on justice, shielding government overreach by pricing the public out of court.
comment in response to post
Everyday Citizens Individual citizens, like a whistleblower, disabled veteran, or grieving parent, couldn’t realistically afford a bond in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.
comment in response to post
Nonprofits and Advocacy Groups Environmental watchdogs often operate on limited budgets. A required bond, even $50,000 or $100,000, could bankrupt them before their case even begins. Example: An environmental group sues to stop the federal government from
comment in response to post
- The court must set a bond amount based on the potential cost or harm to the government if it loses. - Judges are explicitly banned from considering: - Whether you’re poor - Whether you’re a nonprofit - Whether your rights are being violated
comment in response to post
Let’s look into the details: If you want a judge to block a harmful government action, whether it’s cutting off medical access, gutting environmental protections, or violating your civil rights, you’d now have to post a financial bond first.
comment in response to post
This would make it nearly impossible for regular people, civil rights groups, or nonprofits to challenge the government. The only ones left with the money to sue? Billionaires and big corporations.
comment in response to post
The Senate added a provision that would force anyone trying to block the federal government in court to pay a massive upfront bond, no exceptions, no matter your income. Judges wouldn’t be allowed to lower or waive it, even if someone’s rights are being violated.
comment in response to post
opening a protected national park to oil drilling. Under this bill, they’d have to front possibly millions just to get a judge to pause the project while the case is heard. Even with a strong case, the price tag alone could shut them down.
comment in response to post
They're updating her misinformation settings.
comment in response to post
Ditto.
comment in response to post
Coloring book.
comment in response to post
Nope. We don't want it. Just the Russian supporters do.
comment in response to post
I get what you mean, there's no reason to dress like MAGA. We're much better than they are and don't need to use their cheap tactics.
comment in response to post
Nevermind patches or little carriable flags, just straight to Old Glory underoos. Get off your high horse and quit with the bs.
comment in response to post
Good call. The flowers are a nice callback to the peace movement and the civil rights movement.