Profile avatar
stanveuger.bsky.social
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute www.aei.org/veuger
452 posts 1,820 followers 890 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Deze provisie was geen onderdeel van de versie die in het Huis is aangenomen
comment in response to post
Yes, in the actual World Cup there is no finer geography than continent across which you can diversify. But here there is! So they apply the same logic.
comment in response to post
Conditional on you making that first choice it seems like the obvious thing to do! They’re consistently valuing geographic diversity in addition (some might say over) quality.
comment in response to post
I mean the selection criteria are such that Auckland City always qualifies, “the wrong top English team is there” feels like a pretty minor complaint in comparison
comment in response to post
Funny. (‘79-‘86 is not a period we like to think about.)
comment in response to post
Bebeto’s involvement in that offside goal in ‘94 alone should make him unacceptable in polite company, let alone all-time anythings. Of course Romario was involved in the same thing, but he’s forgiven.
comment in response to post
Oh I agree with your broader point for sure.
comment in response to post
Bebeto? Better than Gullit?? Unbelievable.
comment in response to post
If I were in your position I would also go after Lampard!
comment in response to post
(Some might add Lampard to the list. And Jorginho!)
comment in response to post
I see your point here but Chelsea has had a surprising number of all-time great players, if not always at their peak: surely Gullit, Robben, Weah, and Desailly would have a shot at making Flamengo’s all-time 11
comment in response to post
3.5+1.5 is the NATO ask as well
comment in response to post
"Real-world complications of self-ID" lmao we've *had* self-ID for years and none of the anti-trans movement's deranged predictions about men flooding into women's sports or women's bathrooms has come true! They're making a slippery-slope argument about something that is already the status quo.