Profile avatar
sterlewine.bsky.social
Music writer and journalist, a founding editor of Allmusic now freelancer for hire. Bylines at Pitchfork, Rolling Stone, Mojo Magazine, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post and more. Subscribe to my Newsletter: sterlewine.substack.com
655 posts 5,588 followers 489 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
It's an enjoyable record! (I mean the Doobies, although I like them both.)
comment in response to post
Looking forward to checking this out, thanks for the tip!
comment in response to post
Can’t speak to my review but the album is worth the wait.
comment in response to post
I had a very similar Lollapalooza 94 experience and somehow worked Luscious Jackson into the mix too.
comment in response to post
Happy to help! And hope you’re pleased with the record
comment in response to post
In any case, the Taylor's Version project is now an artifact of a different kind: no longer an "artist's rights" gambit by the world's biggest & possibly wealthiest megastar, it takes its rightful place the headiest Baudrillardian similacra/simulation intervention ever staged by a megastar
comment in response to post
My personal preference is always for original versions but my 16 year old stepdaughter prefers the Taylor’s Versions for musical reasons.
comment in response to post
I'm of a very similar mind. The loss of received canon can result in some fascinating and unexpected connections and juxtapositions, but I do think context and history is necessary to preserve. I also have been thinking that the context of 21st music could easily be lost to a digital dark age.
comment in response to post
Exactly. The "classic rock" era was defined by cross pollination (this is true even of a good portion of the alt-rock years, too).
comment in response to post
That's a really good point. "Classic" connotates something different than "Oldies," for one, suggesting that it is something that's endured. And the line between "Classic Rock" and "Album Rock" is blurry, but there's a difference in sensibility between the two.
comment in response to post
Having genres and styles siloed into carefully-tailored formats does a disservice to all the overly-familiar hits, which often sound livelier when put next to other hits from their era.
comment in response to post
I definitely do--and I know there are "classic alternative" stations, too.
comment in response to post
One radio station out of northern Michigan had a regular DJ that specialized in rarities from the 50s and 60s--and the album rock station from western Michigan had a distinct prog-rock bent that distinguished it from other stations. That kind of DJ-driven, region-specific playlist is gone.
comment in response to post
Two of my absolute favorite artists of any genre.
comment in response to post
There's definitely a shift within his own discography where the first two records aim at airplay, the second target streaming to the point they seem like data dumps. He's always peddled product but the shift toward a formless format reveals how he's essentially a cipher.
comment in response to post
Until I revisited it five years ago for that Studio Albums box, I thought I never needed to hear it again…and it played better than I remembered.