Profile avatar
stunotstuart.bsky.social
200 posts 155 followers 223 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Also, the guy I replied to blocked me. I didn't yell at him or attack him personally. I just disagreed with him. What a loser.
comment in response to post
Playing dead while the bear mauls you is not a good political strategy, especially when every indicator shows that outside of the MAGA 35%, the entire country is looking for fighters.
comment in response to post
Bari Weiss is Laura Loomer with a byline.
comment in response to post
Huh. I thought political donations were free speech.
comment in response to post
'Political realism' from a devoted Fugazi fan. I'm sure Guy and Ian are all about incremental change. What an idiot.
comment in response to post
Lakshya blocked me when I questioned his methods. I didn't call him names or yell. He's just a loser.
comment in response to post
Chavez - Gone Glimmering Just captures the love of rock n' roll.
comment in response to post
Well, Jeremy Peters has always been a stupid POS so imagine my lack of surprise at his byline.
comment in response to post
The Pitt. A magical ER where in the first 8 hours of the day, we get a patient for every single cultural touchstone or hot button issue of the day. It's fun, but it is also performative pandering. Im assuming in hour 10 an IDF officer and BDS supporter will be forced to share a room!
comment in response to post
The list is list of facts you fucking douchenozzle.
comment in response to post
Nope, nope, nope, Ian! Avoiding death isn't a poll-tested kitchen table issue. Dems didn't poll well on death during the whole death panel phase of the ACA, so the wise choice is just to stay silent on this one, let a pandemic happen and be there to reap the electoral benefits afterwards!
comment in response to post
California is the world's fifth largest economy after us, China, Germany, and Japan. It contributes 88b more to the govt than it takes, the largest difference that exists. Stop defending Navarro's blatant demagoguery.
comment in response to post
That's no excuse for crapping on the rest of the country. The 'Left Coast' is not about extending empathy to the middle of the country, it's a message specifically designed to turn the issues of the rust belt into partisan grievances that are then used to divide the country for political gain.
comment in response to post
Just the coasts that make all the fucking money, lead the world in education.
comment in response to post
My take is that these people are already in the tank for breaking more laws to protect themselves, so the only option is to highlight the illegality and immorality of it all. Better to go down swinging...
comment in response to post
That is the issue. More criming = greater incentives to end democracy.
comment in response to post
Thank you!! If only the senior leadership in congress and their analysts agreed...
comment in response to post
Just to be clear, a traitor Dem partnered with the Repubs, @slotkin.senate.gov . She needs to be primaried off this planet.
comment in response to post
She's not great.
comment in response to post
Okay, Doomer.
comment in response to post
Be mad at us all you want. I'm too. But he did not break 50%. Very close, but he didn't do it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Un...
comment in response to post
You're as bad at this as RFK Jr was yesterday.
comment in response to post
Huh. How strange of me to assume you were telling him to shut up because you disagreed with his take. I guess I should've 'divined' that you were just missing into the feed for no particular reason. Taking you at your word that you just hate Dave I stand by my take that you're an emotional vomiter.
comment in response to post
But you also say it leads to bad arguments. Take your own advice. And if you want Dave to go away, wrestle with his takes and make an argument instead of pissing on the timeline like a you're a dog and its a tree. Your take was just you emotional vomiting.
comment in response to post
Huh, I guess by your own admission, you're a 'weirdo' and prone to developing bad arguments out of 'dunking'...
comment in response to post
I'm no media defender, but Weigel is right. Regardless of the reason for it, Biden's obvious aging was contributing to the fact that he was going to tank the country over his pathetic ego. He needed to get out in '23, and I will never forgive him for not getting out.
comment in response to post
You shut up, Biden dead ender. His approvals were in the effing 30s for 2 yrs! Aging or not, he was going to lose, despite his very Trump-like belief that "only I can win". He f'ed Kamala, and he f'ed the country! Remember how Obama wouldn't endorse him early in any campaign? Take a cue from that.
comment in response to post
Yes. Judging the hearings by themselves is flawed.
comment in response to post
Arguing against fighting for democracy and using the 24 election as justification is just simply wrong. Based on your logic, there would never be accountability for law breaking, never be a reason to impeach. Just a dumb and fatalistic argument.