tdwolf.bsky.social
Our last national litmus test was in 2024. If you voted for a convicted felon over a law enforcement officer, you failed at morals. If you voted for an adjudicated R-ist over a woman, you failed at basic humanity.
1,205 posts
184 followers
23 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
That was it.
The parade coordinator probably didn't know what they were doing.
comment in response to
post
Also, you can claim anything you want.
So far, you've failed to back any of it up.
Have a nice life, bigot.
comment in response to
post
TDS is a conservative problem.
I've explained why you're a bigot. Really you need only support Trump for that tittle in my opinion, bit you've corroborated that opinion.
How many kids die in Gaza? Are you ever going to condemn Israel?
comment in response to
post
Nope. I haven't mentioned Tara Reade's case because I haven't bothered to look into the claims. Nor do I plan to, since someone else knocked the talk out of you by mentioning her constant changes.
I condemn Trump because he's been held liable in court based on false allegations of his innocence.
comment in response to
post
Except you have zero capacity to verify that truth.
That's what courts are for.
The reason that evidence is inadmissible is because it is not reliable evidence.
By admitting that this conversation is based on "personal truth" and "SEPECTIVE BELIEF," you admit you don't have shit.
comment in response to
post
Right, whatever you say. Bigot.
You're wrong. You're disrespectful. You're ignorant of basic law doctrine. And you're brainwashed to high hell.
Get over yourself.
comment in response to
post
It's a point that makes you appear more than a little bigoted right now.
You haven't denounced Gaza once in this conversation yet feel the need to harp on about this bullshit to try and paint Biden as an evil man.
Whelp. What more could you ask for than "supports mass murder of brown people"?
comment in response to
post
No, you can't.
You can act like you can. You can make baseless claims and assumptions.
Ashley is in her 40s. There isn't a GD thing on this planet that could make her fear her dottering old man right now.
You're just being incredibly disrespectful to HER right now. Nothing else.
comment in response to
post
We have evidence he went behind congress and supported the GAZA invasion.
comment in response to
post
Yeah those are the *only* phrases said, which are NOT detailed descriptions.
I don't get why you're ranty about this. I straight up said he's culpable in genocide. If he should be accountable for anything, shouldn't be THAT?
comment in response to
post
Does. Not. Matter.
It's. Still. Hearsay.
Inadmissible. In. Court. Without. Testimony.
comment in response to
post
Bit late to be outapoken...
comment in response to
post
Hearsay is dismissable without corroboration by direct witnesses testimony.
If Ashley says no, then no.
comment in response to
post
After that thing called "due process" sure.
Due process requires evidence.
Evidence must be scrutinized and there are rules on what is and is not acceptable evidence.
Recorded information done in an informal capacity, like a diary, falls into the hearsay category.
comment in response to
post
No, actually, it's not. You have dismissable hearsay. Not acceptable evidence in a court of law.
Ashley is the only person who can testify on that document.
And if she's later looked back at those events and decided she mistook them, we should accept and her judgment.
comment in response to
post
To be clear, Biden is a shit dude. He fully supported the Gaza genocide and did evil things as president.
I won't defend him against any valid claims.
But if we're playing the "you have to believe the woman" game, Ashley's current stance appears to contradict your statement.
comment in response to
post
1) That diary was stolen property and sold for profit.
2) It's a bit gross to claim something someone wrote as a child when they, as an adult, denounce the veracity of those writings.
If Ashley made accusations now, I'll believe her without a second thought. Until SHE makes those claims? No dice.
comment in response to
post
Wow even Skynet says that's fucked up.
comment in response to
post
Haven't heard that yet, I'll look for it later.
comment in response to
post
So they're doing the usual "let's see how little we have to do" game.
comment in response to
post
Oh no, there's a long way to hell, my friend. This is just the top of the cartoon cliff.
And belief or not, stupidity and incompetence can tip us over as easily as evil. Again, it's how we got here.
Trump is just the symptom. The cause is the institution that gave rise to him.
comment in response to
post
I'm not one to believe things without evidence, even my own things, but it's not really all that unreasonable.
Isn't ICE operating illegally for that alone? Don't federal agents have to have clear identifiers?
comment in response to
post
How many times have we been told that? "This is the one, ya'll! This'll be the WoW killer! I mean the president who'll fix all the things!"
comment in response to
post
Is there any way to actually identify them? I haven't seen any consistent markings.
Seems like any van full of racists can just roll up, grab someone, and deport them to a field somewhere.
comment in response to
post
They really are just mall cops on power trips.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, midnight tonight (20 minutes) SCOTUS: "We're filing a stay, the National Guard is to maintain their posts until we rule on this sometime 2029"
comment in response to
post
As Devin would say: "Hopefully the courts will enforce it!"
comment in response to
post
I suppose we'll see.
Quick side question, I want to see this speech. Are we talking about his presser?
comment in response to
post
Dumb, isn't it?
Seems like a weakness. Like we'd want recognized experts in a specific field to oversee the national oversight of that field.
comment in response to
post
So they at least told the truth.
By accident.
comment in response to
post
Is he, though? Biden talked a lot about "trying," and he did some good, but the more you scrutinize his presidency, the more shit you dig up.
I'm really sick of the shit. And all I see in Newsome is someone who looks constipated and just dancing for a chance.
I hear AOC has been popular lately.
comment in response to
post
Same shit, different election.
comment in response to
post
I'll never support him for that alone.
Constantly appealing to and compromising with the right is what got us here.
I want hard left socialist democrats. People who recognize the pre-Reagan economy was actually the best but also recognize humanity human dignity need to be recovered and preserved.
comment in response to
post
Counter point: Fuck Joe Rogan some more.
comment in response to
post
I think the effort is ours to make, to be honest.
There's a growing movement and call to educate among the academic community to combat pseudoscience and the "post-truth" era.
The same can be started for politics as well. More people publicly addressing the issues and popularizing solutions.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but was it good or comprehensive?
comment in response to
post
I don't think anyone really likes the heavily armed mall cops brazenly kidnapping people, no.
But I also don't think many of us liked the way we did this shit before, either.
comment in response to
post
"Want your country back? Send us a 140 million dollars in unmarked 20s. No cops or the country gets it!"
comment in response to
post
I mean, yeah? I think better education on the matter would go a lot further towards getting everyone on the correct side of the argument.
Learning even a little about it got me from ignorant to questioning the necessities of countries.
comment in response to
post
"I'm not anti-immigrant. I just want them to do it LEGALLY!"
Me: Bitch, we're the ones who decide what's legal in the first place!
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Well, at least we can agree that everything you said is accurate there. So there's that. A bit dishonest to refuse to acknowledge the point, but eh.
I'm not against immigration. My ideal system is a med exam (screen for certain diseases), a background check, and a hearty welcome. Mostly for show.
comment in response to
post
So do I, dude. I'm pretty sure I illustrated how you keep ahead of the potential problems several times now. You're just shifting goal posts.
What happens if you don't "have skills" and just let the avalanche of refugees and rampant growth without keeping up with the parts they need?
comment in response to
post
"You're pretending to be an authority and come across like an LLM"
"YOU MADE AN AD HOMINEM!"
Really?
comment in response to
post
My response was to someone who wanted uncontrolled immigration.
comment in response to
post
Shifting the goal posts. Awesome.
comment in response to
post
Unless you don't have the jobs available to fill.
You have to build the facilities to create jobs. Which take time and resources. If you don't have the resources on hand or it takes too long, the unemployed pops resort to unrest.
If left unchecked long enough?
comment in response to
post
And yet 4x games ARE simulations of reality. VERY boiled down, VERY simplified, VERY limited in depth and detail by comparison.
And yet you can learn enough from them to slip off the peak of Mt. Stupid on the Dunning-Kruger graph and into the realm of "I don't know shit, beyond it's conplicated."