thaxter.bsky.social
NaN = Not A Number
Weird America & UFOs.
Crossing timelines without a visa.
OC cat photos always get a like.
12,140 posts
1,565 followers
514 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
No disagreement. But it bears watching over the next week in particular.
Given my brief experience with LAPD (awful, stupid) and The News, there are hopeful signs.
comment in response to
post
Twitter in particular backed off the RW bot armies until Elon deleted his anti-Trump posts, then the pendulum swung back.
comment in response to
post
Let's also add "less than lethal" rounds have set fires that locals have poured water on and its getting called "insurrection" when the videos show the opposite.
All nations, western or not, are showing signs of state propaganda supported by bot armies.
comment in response to
post
Journalists have gotten hit with rubber bullets. It's not good.
There's plenty more evidence that tactics are escalating.
Even shooting pepper balls at non-violent protesters is crossing a line.
comment in response to
post
Duffy fail
comment in response to
post
Same. So maybe make the reluctant soldiers feel ashamed more than attacked?
comment in response to
post
So in practice, be firm but disapproving. Give 👎 vs 🖕. Make them feel bad vs hostile.
I could be wrong but I think non-violent resistance history shows this to be effective.
@owasow.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
So is malicious compliance.
comment in response to
post
Could be. Won't take long to find out.
I doubt that TFG has the buy-in from the military.
If he doesn't pull it off on the 14th we will know he lacks the support to sustain this for long.
🙏for those who suffer in the margins.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I feel that. Hardly anyone (if any) comes out making no compromises, though.
comment in response to
post
It's only crank if you have a newsletter about it.
comment in response to
post
He's referred to invisible planes at least 3 times: maybe optical stealth leak. He mentioned "hydrosonic" tech a couple of times and no one knew what he was talking about. He's shown satellite photos that reveal capabilities.
If I was in charge of some deep secrets, no way would I let TFG know.
comment in response to
post
No really, go back to the WSJ article and see what sources they consulted (2 DoD, one who had to leave his job for a cushy private gig, and one flaky press officer) and how they backed them up (not at all).
comment in response to
post
A poor, inaccurate summary of poor WSJ/DoD stenography.
comment in response to
post
Eg its not hard to find decades to millenia of bad science due to "we already know everything". Science starts with the assumption that odd observations invite hypotheses, not dismissal.
comment in response to
post
Agree. And "nobody knows" doesn't support the nearest prosaic explanation either.
A true rational mindset accepts "wtf idk" as an ontological reality.
comment in response to
post
Kirkpatrick and Gough: wow, what thorough reporting. :/
Anyone *really* believe an EMP weapon was used blue on blue against a live nuke arsenal in 1965 and the weapon has otherwise been kept 100% secret until SK blabbed about it to the WSJ in 2025?
comment in response to
post
Read the story carefully.
They were testing out an EMP weapon that hasn't been seen 60 yrs hence in a live, secret blue-on-blue exercise that disabled our active nuclear arsenal? Hogswollop.
When a source says lying is routine, journalists ought to get some backup. They didn't.
comment in response to
post
Taller tales than UFOs themselves:
bsky.app/profile/thax...
comment in response to
post
They were testing out an EMP weapon that hasn't been seen 60 yrs hence in a live, secret blue-on-blue exercise that disabled our active nuclear arsenal?
Lmao no. What a load of garbage.
comment in response to
post
"Compliments of"? Is he going to pay for it?
comment in response to
post
No mention of the Jersey drones or the sensitive/military site drones that have never been caught or identified and the Trump admin lying in their first presser that those were FAA approved?
The Trump admin downplayed drones at the first chance, why is this more than performative nonsense?
comment in response to
post
I lived in Boston and Morrill's Corner is the worst. I also lived near that intersection once.
comment in response to
post
Hamberder
comment in response to
post
No one really owns a Tesla.
Everything is computer.
comment in response to
post
Battle Royale
comment in response to
post
Please don't shine lasers at unidentified shit in the sky.
comment in response to
post
OK fair I re-listened and you are right. I might delete my post. Powell didnt answer and the moderator excused Powell with "was that a question".
I think I'll leave it because it was a moment but I have to admit it was the questioner who mentioned "bombshell" evidence, not Powell.
comment in response to
post
The main objection is: we've been wrong about science since forever but this time we know everything there is to know.
Aka interstellar travel is impossible but in 1900 planes were impossible.
comment in response to
post
Lmfao good luck bro
comment in response to
post
Its amazing what being a nice person who isn't a PITA can open up.
comment in response to
post
Agree
comment in response to
post
Jesse does have a very good production team and that includes clearance most of all.
That's not a judgment, just an observation. Its expensive though.
comment in response to
post
There's one thing he promotes heavily that is not standard UFO lore and that's "the US cracked anti-gravity". Whatever the reasons are, that's the payload.
comment in response to
post
Read the other replies, it's old UFO cult shit.
comment in response to
post
I am assoured.
comment in response to
post
"I'm stupid" has some value as a defamation defense.
In American law, doesn't defamation have to be knowingly false?
Still don't think it looks good for the pillow guy.
comment in response to
post
I saw that. No one should be surprised.
Hey where is that money now?