thedialectician.bsky.social
You know who it is.
Read Marx: bit.ly/3HFPyME
Read Lenin: bit.ly/43Y6ohj
Read Stalin: bit.ly/4kBmODh
Read Hoxha: bit.ly/4dYs2Xc
2,948 posts
183 followers
223 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
people because of their ethnicities. He didn't purge people at all. The Central Committee decided to do that, and it was the right decision even if some innocent people got caught up in it. You clearly only see the world in black and white and haven't actually studied history critically.
comment in response to
post
progressive in 2025 and they're going to fall short. He was a humanist. He didn't have a thirst for torture and blood. He was fighting fascism, which is an extremely violent fight. The West clearly didn't go far enough persecuting Nazis and other fascists. Just look around you. He didn't purge
comment in response to
post
There was no genocide. Refute any of the points before. Biden had psychopathic cops, and what do you think the FBI is? Homophobia was pretty normal in the early 20th century. Hate crimes happen all the time in the US. I'm queer and carry a knife everywhere. Judging any historical leader against a
comment in response to
post
No worries. At least we worked it out. Such a rarity in social media.
comment in response to
post
This is actually a double entendre in my specific case, and it's true on both levels!
comment in response to
post
🤡
comment in response to
post
Ya, it's just going to magically happen. Wake me up when you all have an actual revolutionary theory and not just a bunch of random tactics and utopian dreams about how the future might look if everyone just wanted to live an anarchist lifestyle.
comment in response to
post
I totally get your frustration with the photo selection process! It's so annoying when technology makes simple things complicated. A direct photo album access button would be a dream! ✨
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
You brought up Trump. No one's defending him. We can be critical of everyone, even your emotional support war criminal.
Since you brought up that he hasn't been president in 3 terms, yeah, that makes this entire post even weirder.
comment in response to
post
Why are you celebrating a murderer?
comment in response to
post
friends. And this is what's happening in the US right now. Capitalism is always unsustainable. It gets to the point where the capitalists are terrified of losing everything, and they require leaders like Trump to implement reforms that will ultimately fail and (hopefully) spark revolution.
comment in response to
post
It didn't fail. After Stalin, they abandoned socialist construction. That's because Khrushchev and the leaders that came after him were revisionists and didn't follow Marxism. They were doing fine until they restored capitalism. It was capitalism that failed, and ushered in Putin and his oligarch
comment in response to
post
want to develop, and they are doing pretty well. You can judge them by Western standards, but the West doesn't really set the standard for stability and friendship with other nations. That's what the DPRK wants, and what the US denies them.
comment in response to
post
"communist state" 😂
The DPRK's philosophy, Juche, is all about self-reliance. What you see in the DPRK is a country trying to recover from near total destruction—simply because they choose land reform and the US didn't like it—without much assistance at all from other countries. That's how they
comment in response to
post
The DPRK is also a lot more democratic
comment in response to
post
How can something that never existed fail?
comment in response to
post
I told her that Quebec is 3,000 miles away, and she just turned her head to the side and looked confused
comment in response to
post
instead of developing, we're stagnating just like the USSR did after they abandoned socialist construction and restored capitalism.
comment in response to
post
a totally new era, like the one technological advances should have created by now, but capital is holding us back. The G20 average profit rate tanked 60 years ago, and our economy depends on the availability of capital, whether or not material and human resources are available, to develop. So,
comment in response to
post
They rallied behind Stalin because he was a great statesman, and Western leaders like Churchill agreed. He also oversaw the development of a semi-feudal/agrarian state into an industrial superpower within those people's lifetimes. Imagine an American leader investing so much in America that we enter
comment in response to
post
Stalin and Mao weren't fascists. Fascism develops out of liberalism, out of capital in crisis, when capitalists need domestic foot soldiers to keep workers in line as the economy tanks, which is happening in the US, a liberal democracy with a democratically elected president, right now.
comment in response to
post
Please stop using that meaningless word. We've been clowning on your simplistic thinking for 150 years. Here is Engles making a mockery of people who think "authoritarianism" is a thing.
share.google/7x9dxrw5Lb77...
comment in response to
post
Ok. I just don't see why. If I say "incinerators eliminate trash" does that mean that trash is magically eliminated by the existence of incinerators, or that the work incinerators do is the elimination of the trash you put in them?
comment in response to
post
*state
Ffs
comment in response to
post
That is a subcategory of liberalism (the ideology of capitalism), and it's one word "neoliberal".
comment in response to
post
"You appear to be a communist. Does that mean you side with Putin, the anticommunist, or Khrushchev, the tank guy who turned his back on the revolution?"
Surely there are no other options here. One could never fathom always standing with the working classes of every country. Gross.
comment in response to
post
"You appear to be a communist. Does that mean you side with Putin, the anticommunist, or Khrushchev, the tank guy who turned his back on the revolution?"
Surely there are no other options here. One could never fathom always standing with the working classes of every country. Gross.
comment in response to
post
Ya, socialism is the proletarian state.
Yo, I have a Lenin pfp for a reason lol
comment in response to
post
That's why I ramped the pedantry to the next level. I thought your comment was pretty obviously a joke.
comment in response to
post
Good little Nazi citizens
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
I mean that socialism is the process by which the state is eliminated. Once that process is complete, then we'll achieve communism. Communism, therefore, is not the eliminating force, but the result of the elimination carried out through socialism. Get it?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Psst, psst... Socialism eliminates the states. Communism is what happens after that.
comment in response to
post
Wanna hold hands next to the MLRS?
comment in response to
post
Hey dude, shut the fuck up. You should be embarrassed by how shallow your understanding of liberal society is.
comment in response to
post
Aww geez now I have to explain to Dahlia why our apartment can't have a deck and a yard
comment in response to
post
At the wall 6am Monday morning. We'll bring the coffee and donuts
... For us to enjoy after the meeting
comment in response to
post
In this case, the false positives should also be locked up, so it's a win no matter what happens.
comment in response to
post
Good point
comment in response to
post
"Oh fuck. This person knows more than me. I know! I call them stupid! They'll never figure out that I'm the stupid one! I'm a genius!!"
- Fred Sondheim
comment in response to
post
The best way to find him might be looking for new incidences of police brutality against black people or domestic violence
comment in response to
post
(celebratory bong rips)
comment in response to
post
No kings except all the little capitalist ones who treat their employees like property
comment in response to
post
Especially when Google is right fucking there