timwayne.bsky.social
🐾 Haight-Ashbury, San Francisco 🌁🌉
🐾 Gay married
🐾 Dog trainer, political campaign consultant (often interchangeably)
🐾 EFF alumnus
🐾 theycallhimtimmy.com
🐾 🇺🇦🇮🇱🐕👨🏼❤️👨🏻🍱🍆🦀🏹🐕🦺
2,017 posts
294 followers
181 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Oh my god it's brilliant!
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
Perhaps. I tend to pass on invitations to violence from anonymous _agents provocateur_.
comment in response to
post
I don't answer to anonymous trolls - cowards too afraid to put their on their speech.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, that's exactly what I said.
<eye roll>
comment in response to
post
Swing voters in focus groups brought up the trans/sports issue frequently. He’s probably reacting to that.
comment in response to
post
Don’t lose too much sleep over the noise from anonymous trolls. They have lots of accounts per troll, they are noisy AF, risk nothing personal, contribute nothing, and are consistently negative. This badly-written piece of clout-chasing is very much is beneath you to respond.
Block and move on.
comment in response to
post
<shrug>
I blame the voters. Women know full well that choice is on the ballot every election.
comment in response to
post
They better be well armed if they want to operate in San Francisco. More of my Leftist friends have guns than you would believe.
(I’ll stick with throwing eggs but some of my friends are crazy when it comes to the creeping encroachment of fascism)
comment in response to
post
I still can’t believe Biden lost the white female vote.
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
Musk can write all the checks he wants; someone who did so much damage to so many people around the world for so shitty a reason should not be welcomed back into the fold.
comment in response to
post
Hi. San Franciscan here. I can confirm this is the general opinion of him amongst my friends and neighbors.
comment in response to
post
Nevermind. I read the article. Seems like Pride was trying to keep politics *out* of the event by disinviting a performer. Looks like they handled it badly. Ooops.
comment in response to
post
Why does the festival need to take any position on that issue? It's SF Pride. Anything outside of San Francisco's borders is really beyond the mandate of the organization.
comment in response to
post
All those people and not one of them went for the tires.
Come on, people. It takes two seconds.
comment in response to
post
This is a little too subtle for me. I can tell it's Vance but the printing is faint and the uniform obscured. Is it the lost, hopeless, helpless look on this face, or is the uniform an SS uniform that I just can't make out? Is the 18 important?
Sorry. I'm slow.
comment in response to
post
That's what some of the Morlocks on the right are saying. I wouldn't bet on it. Trump has the military behind him. And against Musk, he probably has Congress, even many of the Democrats.
comment in response to
post
Doesn't seem staged to me. There's no upside for Trump for Elon having tweeted that thing about Epstein. None. There's no upside for either one of them for any of this.
comment in response to
post
What about Netroots of the Center?
comment in response to
post
More like this:
comment in response to
post
If not for Florida, New York would have had the worst response, thanks largely to Cuomo, who's probably going to win this contest.
comment in response to
post
It's a nice performance, but we get far more out of these witnesses when we hire one person to ask the questions instead of letting all these different Congress members have their pithy moment in the sun.
comment in response to
post
I'm going to get drunk on schadenfreudenberry wine.
comment in response to
post
It's weird how some people seem to think the President has the power to set prices of goods and services in the market. It's also weird how they let *congress* completely off the hook for domestic policy when *congress* is the branch of government capable of fixing price gouging.
comment in response to
post
Obama's '08 campaign centered on health care reform, not specifically on a public option. Total nonsense. Fantasyland.
comment in response to
post
And you think the recovery from the pandemic isn't responsible for sinking Biden's chances? You think the stink of it that got all over Harris didn't hamper her chances?
LOL. You're not a serious person.
comment in response to
post
Obama won in 08 because we were in the middle of a financial collapse that the Democrats were successfully able to blame entirely on the GOP, W, and Republican policies of deregulation. He got significant centrist and Republican support, and it wasn't for tacking left.
comment in response to
post
Many things contributed to Democratic losses in 2024, including the fallout from a once-in-a-century pandemic that killed a million Americans and threw a wrench into the economy. Blaming it on your own particular issue with Democrats is a classic post hoc error.
comment in response to
post
I answered that question already (see screenshot). Progressives shouldn't be loyal and Democrats should end all pretense of reaching out and instead cut them loose. There are far more votes to be had in the center among non-voters and persuadable swing voters.
comment in response to
post
EXACTLY. They are not loyal. I would rather they be shunned than having campaign resources spent on outreach.
comment in response to
post
She didn't need anti-Democrat leftists. She needed the center. All races shake out that way: the fringe left is tiny, and all but single-digits come around and vote Democratic in the general. What's at play is the center. So that's where the outreach goes.
comment in response to
post
I disagree. Those are sufficient examples of placating the left - outreach they don't deserve, since they've never shown any loyalty to the party.
You lose.
comment in response to
post
I'm sure some might feel that way, but many do not. It's not like you conducted a poll. You're basically talking out your ass.
comment in response to
post
Happy Pride!