tosco.bsky.social
Journalist, photographer and videographer.
254 posts
182 followers
174 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
It has to do with children, and killing them. And with hypocrisy too.
comment in response to
post
Uma pequena amostra aqui do serviço sujo -
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
FHC foi visto tentando o suicídio pulando de cabeça do próprio ego.
comment in response to
post
Ela perguntou: amor, o que vc vai fazer com o relação ao genocídio na Palestina? Não aguento mais ver fotos de crianças mortas. Ele respondeu: Nada né? Sou tchutchuca do Netaniahu . Aí o pau comeu!
comment in response to
post
Starmer, Macron what are you gonna do about it? Keep pretending genocide is not happening right under your noses? What kind of leaders are you?
comment in response to
post
Nossa, mas que coincidência, não?
comment in response to
post
Primeiro de abril já passou.
comment in response to
post
What is the problem with using Super Hornets as tankers?
comment in response to
post
A falta que faz um amigo, né?
comment in response to
post
O Boris Casoy me causa nojo, ponto!
comment in response to
post
Old habits die hard.
comment in response to
post
Sorry to say but the US is already there.
comment in response to
post
Se o cessar fogo é unilateral a UE não tem que aceitar ou rejeitar nada, não é?
comment in response to
post
Is that the same feeling Iran has when the USA base its B2 at Diego Garcia?
comment in response to
post
True Lettuce.
comment in response to
post
The Boss!!
comment in response to
post
I know pinguins, nobody knows pinguins better than me. Pinguins are nasty. The have been free loading on the USA sardines for a long time. Let's get it all back
comment in response to
post
Who is threatening who??? The US is threatening to bomb Iran, not the other way around. Get real on your headlines!
comment in response to
post
Further more the EU GDP is almost 10X the size of the Russian, in no military theory is possible for Russia to invade and occupy an enemy that is so superior, not only economically but as well on human resources and in technology.
comment in response to
post
How Russia would benefit from attacking NATO ? The only scenario where is logical to attack is in the case of placing nuclear missiles close to their border. But I guarantee you, if Mexico joined a military pact with China and put Chinese soldiers at the border the US would invade Mexico in no time
comment in response to
post
I hope that in a multi-polar world we will have a better distribution of power among several nations and the world will be a better place.
comment in response to
post
The Russians never gave us any problems but in the other hand the Americans organised and supported a military cup that killed your young democracy and made us live in a dictatorship for 21 years. Meaning any hegemon will always cast a shadow in their backyard.
comment in response to
post
That is very true, I am very far away therefore it's easier for me. But I believe international relations are most of all an exercise of pragmatism, and I believe the Russians to be very pragmatic. I would worry more about Trump invading Greenland.
comment in response to
post
Russia does not have the economy, the gear, the man power nor the demographics to invade a NATO country. And most of all, Russia has nothing to gain from it. So no, Russia will not invade you. The next war is gonna be fought in the Pacific, with China and you would be wise to stay out of it.
comment in response to
post
It's kind of funny to observe this discussion, you are all coming from a rude awakening that the US is a hegemon, and it's not really your friend. Later on you are going to find out that Russia is not really your enemy, nor is China or Iran.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Os economistas, o mercado, a Faria Lima e todo esse povo erra 11 em cada 10 previsões. Não sei porque vcs continuam publicando se eles nunca acertam.