transferprotocol.bsky.social
hi it's terence
225 posts
84 followers
75 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Ah ok you just think being anti Zionist is anti Semitic automatically
comment in response to
post
Why don’t these people know Booker is the guy who voted for the bill that gives a big fat thumbs up to Trump continuing to accept crypto bribes unabated?
comment in response to
post
Fuck, it totally is The Thing
comment in response to
post
Been meaning to visit this place for years, thank you for capturing it in such a brutal aspect 🤌
comment in response to
post
Oh sweet the piece
-meal men can i get uhhh ten piece meal and uhhhhhhhhhhhh ummmm [as i am sliced and diced] a uhhhhh
comment in response to
post
What makes it worse than Pete Buttigieg going on Fox? Is it because Buttigieg is already shit so he doesn't have a good reputation to throw away?
comment in response to
post
I’ve been doing some Hildegard research lately myself! Alkemie did some great interpretations for the Pentiment soundtrack, and I also love love love Catherine Braslavsky’s take here youtu.be/8yXJ0MDTI4Q?...
comment in response to
post
☝️🤓
comment in response to
post
There is, and yet you winge and criticize and demand sources and proof time and again yet provide none yourself. Exemplary
comment in response to
post
Yet somehow it is Democratic voters like me, who dared to ask the most basic human decency of their candidate (or candidates, if you count both Biden and then Harris), that are blamed by proud centrists for the loss
comment in response to
post
You say this like the bombing and blockade of aid didn't also occur during the 14 months during which Democrats held the White House. Sadly, it is true that both parties have funded and supported Israel's genocide of Palestinians. I voted for Democrats but I also protested their genocidal support.
comment in response to
post
Yes generally a ceasefire requires both sides. Like the ceasefire which was agreed to earlier this year, which Israel then violated two hundred times, killing over a hundred people, before finally just openly resuming bombing and blockade of aid
comment in response to
post
Okay i see you are historically illiterate if you think the bad deeds of Gaza compare to 70 years of ethnic cleansing by Israel
comment in response to
post
My mistake, it was hundreds of *human rights organizations* www.amnesty.org/en/latest/ne...
www.amnesty.org/en/latest/ne...
comment in response to
post
Hundreds of international aid organizations have concluded it's genocide... what do you need to see that you haven't, yet?
comment in response to
post
Proof can be found in the actions of the military totally aligning with the incitements to genocide, in the elimination of whole neighborhoods, the flattening of infrastructure, including medical, educational, agricultural; the ongoing two-month total blockade of aid; targeting of journalists.
comment in response to
post
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
comment in response to
post
Then the second element in the UN's narrow definition:
-A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
1. Killing members of the group
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
comment in response to
post
or the dehumanizing assertion that there can be no such thing as peaceful Palestinians being born in Gaza - Moti Almoz: "we cannot expect a peaceful generation to be born there"
comment in response to
post
or, Amichai Chikli: "North Gaza until further notice will be unpopulated", or, that the IDF doesn't need to distinguish the "terrorist" population from the civilian population: Gallant: the "State of Israel does not need moral preaching to separate terrorism from the civilian population" ...
comment in response to
post
The UN has a "narrow definition" of genocide, made up of two elements:
-A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"
For proof of this 1st element see the, from the database, Daniella Weiss: "no Arab will remain in Gaza"...
comment in response to
post
yeah I guess I can do more homework for you that you'll probably ignore but maybe somebody else with an open mind who cares about human suffering will read it and it'll matter in the end.
comment in response to
post
Ignore the headline, it's not an article. It's a database, very easily navigable, full of hundreds incitements to genocide over the past years. Take a look, filter how you want by legislators, or public figures, or armed forces, or decision makers, filter by type of incitement, whatever.
comment in response to
post
The words of Israel’s own government and armed forces should suffice:
intent.law4palestine.org?s=decision-m...
comment in response to
post
Okay, genocide denier
comment in response to
post
You care about what words mean right? Read up:
www.un.org/en/genocide-...
comment in response to
post
You could just say “yes, the Democratic party led by Biden is responsible for genocide too”
comment in response to
post
Is comparison inherently one-upping? I don’t think so.
And I agree misery is not zero-sum, that’s why the commenter is wrong to say “what about Ukraine” as if caring about Palestine takes away from caring about Ukraine
comment in response to
post
THIS IS SUCH GOOD NEWS
comment in response to
post
The blood is on your hands, I’m afraid, for engaging in modern day Holocaust denial
comment in response to
post
Excellent 🫡
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Maybe a dumb question but how do you choose locations. Just follow a river on the map and pick the first town you haven't been to yet?
comment in response to
post
Oh hell yeah, thank you for the hot tip
comment in response to
post
I wasn’t familiar with plex before, but checking it out! I don’t see much about sharing in their official pages but from what you’re saying, sounds like users are taking it on themselves to use it socially that way?
comment in response to
post
through which you and your friends can combine your digital music libraries to stream individual tracks whenever you want, without every member having to individually store the whole combined collection? Am i just reinventing an obvious wheel?
comment in response to
post
I've lowkey been thinking about this post on and off for weeks now. I know it's not quite what you proposed, and it's probably only a step removed from good old fashioned peer to peer torrent seeding... but I've been wondering about the technical and ethical hurdles to creating a community server...
comment in response to
post
22.22 GB is my guess