ttablog.bsky.social
356 posts
162 followers
65 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
why not just say "registrable"?
comment in response to
post
so there's inherent distinctiveness, acquired distinctiveness, and self-proclaimed distinctiveness !
comment in response to
post
I once did an in-person talk to this outfit. The meeting was held in Texas.
comment in response to
post
what are the odds of this getting registered on the Principal Register? 1 in 10? I guess the missed out on getting a design patent.
comment in response to
post
In the old days (pre Tam) this would have been refused for self-disparagement.
comment in response to
post
That guy who shot himself out of a cannon?
comment in response to
post
lol
comment in response to
post
Indiana Fever v Connecticut Sun
comment in response to
post
Robert B Parker
comment in response to
post
Chicken out? Or inside?
comment in response to
post
Authorizes only, not only authorizes
comment in response to
post
If there's no real potato is it deceptive under 2(a)?
comment in response to
post
Who thought of 90 feet to first base? Brilliant.
comment in response to
post
This is as old as the hills, IMHO
comment in response to
post
Just go away, Rudy.
comment in response to
post
Truth not Trump
Law not Lies
comment in response to
post
Perhaps surprisingly, the Design chapter was the first to get totally blown up by intervening legal developments.
So expect a major overhaul there.
We'll be updating the "One Day on Designs" supplement as well, which can be used in any IP course where you want to spend one day on design patents.
comment in response to
post
What will we be adding? Amgen, obviously. And LKQ. (Both of which are in our free supplement, by the way.)
What other changes have you seen that you think we should consider?
comment in response to
post
Agree with commenters
comment in response to
post
I said hello, Mary Lou
Good-by heart
(Rick Nelson)