vale.rocks
Front-end developer, designer, dabbler, and avid user of the superpowered information superhighway.
✧ https://vale.rocks
✧ https://fedi.vale.rocks/vale
887 posts
470 followers
306 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Thank you! Glad you learned something.
Now we just need some intricate, interactive papercraft versions of your visualisations. I'm sure browser support for printing them will be coming soon. Pretty simple feature to implement, I'm certain.
comment in response to
post
I add the RSS feeds of my favourite websites to my RSS reader so I know when new posts release.
I use it for distributing podcasts.
I've made a Revolt bot that sends a message in a chat channel when new content is added to a feed.
I have feeds for content on my site so people can subscribe to it.
comment in response to
post
Pages of printed websites line the walls. Bound in the finest of materials. A library of the printed web stretching beyond comprehension. The printed page supreme.
The librarian, a mysterious man by the name of Jeeves, must be asked for the knowledge.
comment in response to
post
It started with nerd sniping. Slow, methodical pickings off. Then more aggressive methods.
Before long it had moved far beyond even that. Fibre optics dug up by the kilometre. Phone towers felled. Printers working overtime. Forests destroyed in pursuit of more paper. Ink flowing like a river.
comment in response to
post
Another nerd successfully sniped. My collection grows.
Before long the entire web will be optimised for print, and step one of my plan for world domination will be achieved. Or something. Actually, I wouldn't know anything about that. Shhh...
comment in response to
post
Polypane users are so cool they've got all the differences memorised and just visualise the print simulation in their mind. (Jokes aside, glad to see guidance slipped into the article with an update)
Also, that Can I DevTools website is a great little resource I'm only just finding out about now.
comment in response to
post
Many thanks to @bell.bz for his feedback and refinements, including his picking up of my suboptimal use of the word "this".
comment in response to
post
Something that seems really simple but comes with a few gotchas is making a really accessible and usable search UI. I'd love something about that.
comment in response to
post
You've really inf'd some luencers.
comment in response to
post
I dislike LLMs suggesting or writing things in my editor, so I use the web interfaces or the front-end I made to interact with them.
Sometimes I will task them with something bigger, and it will provide genuinely useful output, but every line and section must be vetted and then manually touched up.
comment in response to
post
LLMs are abysmal at HTML and CSS.
I do find them useful for the occasional vibe-coded throwaway tool or as a more complex debug duck/partner when working on actual projects. LLMs can often find implementations that I wouldn't have otherwise thought of, even if they get specifics wrong.
comment in response to
post
I wrote about this some months ago. In summary, yes – at least when it comes to technologies.
vale.rocks/posts/ai-is-...
comment in response to
post
Check out marginalia-search.com and searchmysite.net
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Can confirm Andy is adherent to the advice he preaches. He's picked me for doing it, and my writing was better for the change. 10/10, wouldn't 'this' again.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
The silty sediment that swirls at the bottom of a river bed. Slightly washed out and absorbent of light rather than reflective. Clay muddles what is otherwise organic and grounding. Decaying leaves and mud. Undulating and dispersing as it ebbs and flows between the toes of those who wade and splash.
comment in response to
post
I heard the div thing was made up and that you shouldn't put it in divs at all.
comment in response to
post
Brings this to mind...
comment in response to
post
This is one of those tips that someone only posts after spending 20 minutes wondering why something wasn't working.
comment in response to
post
"I'm shocked", says one user of the product/service. "I know this exact thing has happened every other time without fail, but I thought this time would be different."
comment in response to
post
I personally think it is completely reasonable to be disappointed in people using AI if it doesn't align with your views.
But, I think it is important to convey that disappointment as personal opinion and constructive criticism on AI usage rather than direct attacks on the person themselves.
comment in response to
post
Emotional rants are a valid way to vent, but lying in those rants, doing them at the expense of others, and throwing out all nuance doesn't particularly benefit the ranter and hurts discourse overall.
There is a balance to be found between being vocal and expressive, and combative and aggressive.
comment in response to
post
I completely understand what you're saying and can certainly appreciate the emotional aspect and the need to express that.
However, I do think there is a distinction to be made between being vocal about distaste for the technology and constructing falsities and making personal hateful attacks.
comment in response to
post
Local man wishes for respectful and nuanced discussion on the internet (gone wrong) (watch to the end) 🤯🤯
comment in response to
post
This post was spurred by the reactions to my own AI writings, the discussion underneath posts by people such as @simonwillison.net and @gracekind.net, and decisions like this one from @emollick.bsky.social: