voughdermort.bsky.social
Post-constitutional hero impounding medical research funding for proposals to reanimate Sen. Joe McCarthy. Branding Elon’s goons with a Dark Mark while pushing a Trinity theory for the unitary executive. Wanna play ‘Simon Says’ with the Constitution?
533 posts
138 followers
114 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Why are grand jury charges being posted on Twitter?
comment in response to
post
I am the Dark Lord of Post-Constitutionalism!
comment in response to
post
Yeah she really habeus corpused THEIR asses
comment in response to
post
Dementia setting in
comment in response to
post
likely story. Haha
comment in response to
post
Why have so many democrats been dying?
comment in response to
post
Did not realize how far gone we are.
comment in response to
post
Scary
comment in response to
post
Can FDR help us take a look at ourselves? What coverup are we talking about here?
comment in response to
post
No
comment in response to
post
This is outrageous
comment in response to
post
Is this real?
comment in response to
post
Good post
comment in response to
post
Like saying,”my bad” in a PSA to the entire world 55 times. How many times were not announced? 🤷🏿
comment in response to
post
Those are just the ANNOUNCED changes
comment in response to
post
I don’t mind this photo?
comment in response to
post
Would be cool if he wrote that in a court opinion, you know, on his day job?
comment in response to
post
Actually the surest, most bipartisan indication of corruption yet.
comment in response to
post
Welp
comment in response to
post
Mwhat is CECOT?
comment in response to
post
One thing: where are all the conservatives who were whining about the CFPB having executive, legislative, and judicial power under one roof?
comment in response to
post
At least he bought American
comment in response to
post
Anyone can detain someone breaking the law, but if it’s outside your legal authority you become subject to liability if you’re wrong.
comment in response to
post
Not sure the author has written a letter before
comment in response to
post
This is absurd. Could this be graft?
comment in response to
post
Right…
comment in response to
post
Or worse. But good call.
comment in response to
post
Creates the appearance of impropriety
comment in response to
post
Decided at the SC level, you might add. I think it was the act to protect women? Or maybe the guns kids act? I’m serious I don’t remember the cases. But federal government cannot compel cooperation from state governments. Else, what does the “United States” mean?
comment in response to
post
No it’s for Putin. What are you, disloyal?
comment in response to
post
Or…by a media environment that boosts sweeping, inflammatory statements like that.
comment in response to
post
I would say that relying on hearsay from nonexistent ordinary people to project treason on Article I courts is treason. Not all speech is protected!
by the First Amendment!
comment in response to
post
Sounds good to me. Not sure he’ll be able to practice law moving forward. I know standards have fallen, Cf. Secretary Jaegermeister, but having a bar license is pretty essential for a U.S. Attorney. 🤷🏿 Maybe don’t break every rule of professional conduct in service of traitors to the Constitution?
comment in response to
post
To be fair, Hegseth dealt the hand he was given. For a transvestite retard with a genetic predisposition towards alcoholism, Hegseth has waged a noble war.
comment in response to
post
Is following the law in 2025 a good idea? White House officials claim it depends who you voted for while some experts think otherwise.
comment in response to
post
preach