wackjackle.bsky.social
128 posts
81 followers
523 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Ohja, sehe ich erst jetzt. Entschuldigung. Parodie dieses Clowns wichtig und richtig. Weitermachen.
comment in response to
post
Du bist nur ein Clown, den niemand erst nehmen muss und niemand je wieder ernst nehmen wird.
comment in response to
post
Concerning.
comment in response to
post
There is no necessity for any cryptocurrencies. Everything can be done without it.
comment in response to
post
But they're perfect personifications for the End of Liberalism. That's for sure.
comment in response to
post
Wir ihr Sektenmitglieder alle die selben dummen 'Argumente' wiederholt, ist wirklich sehr lustig. 🤡
comment in response to
post
Lustig ist v.a., was Dich so amüsiert. Anscheinend ist Dir immer noch nicht klar, dass man Dich für Dein restliches Leben mit Deinem Verhalten der letzten zig Monate in Verbindung bringen wird und NICHTS anderem. Dein restliches Leben ist nun ausgelöscht. Wer war nochmal die Ditfurth? Oh, oh no.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but his death will be glorious. I still sometimes about the day the dipshit Kissinger finally died. Such amazing memories.
comment in response to
post
How about shutting the fuck up, gringo? Your empire of lies, wars and human suffering has to end!
comment in response to
post
You deserve it for sucking up to Trump and the MAGA crowd. Have a nice day, you piece of shit!
comment in response to
post
Newsflash: Das war es schon immer. SACEUR.
comment in response to
post
So zwischen 1880-1914 war es ganz okay.
comment in response to
post
Richtige Entscheidung. Nach all diesen Monaten gibt es nunmal keinen Grund mehr mit dieser deutschen Sekte zu streiten. Die haben sich selbst so positioniert, wie Mensch es ihnen immer nachtragen wird müssen. Kein Vergessen wer da mitgemacht hat.
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't have responded, but 'silly lil liberal' is funny. While most liberals are out of touch with reality I do like it, if they make me laugh.
comment in response to
post
Thanks, Silly lil liberal.
comment in response to
post
Gut ausformuliert, aber wozu noch die Mühe? Der Typ gehört bis ans Lebensende ausgeschlossen und soll Teil seiner Sekte bleiben. Wenn kümmern diese Leute noch? Sie haben ihr wahres Gesicht nun ausreichend gezeigt. Keine Diskussionen mehr mit denen und fertig. Deliberation muss Grenzen kennen.
comment in response to
post
Du bist einer der peinlichsten Freaks aus der deutschen Sekte, die online herum laufen. Dir wird man niemals verzeihen und man wird es Dir bis an Dein Lebensende nachtragen und Dich immer und immer wieder daran erinnern. Freu Dich schon mal darauf, Du abscheulicher f'cking Schmutz! Versprochen!
comment in response to
post
That was always the case. The fuck are you talking about? The Empire will fall either way. Who cares anymore?
comment in response to
post
Geil. Man weiß, dass es so richtig asozial werden wird und diese Unmenschen toppen das immer wieder.
comment in response to
post
No, not really. It's a little more complicated. +5°C maybe 2080-2100 (worst case..)
comment in response to
post
That's wikipedia!? I'm talking about the ridiculous methods of Nordhaus. Please inform yourself of what he did and what other (climate) experts think about it now. It's just junk science to put it mildly.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I know, and it's utterly worthless. If Nordhaus bullshit is 'good' economic science, the whole neoclassical field is just f'cking laughable. Have you read what this fool did?
comment in response to
post
'Even transactions suitable for barter solutions, where the two parties have reciprocal demands and supplies are conducted with money.
As a natural monopoly, money is government-issued fiat money, trading at a positive value though it conveys no direct utility.'
LMAO, great fucking science! :)
comment in response to
post
'Trade is monetary. One side of all transactions is the economy’s common medium of exchange.
Money is unique: the existence of a unique common medium of exchange in equilibrium is logically derived from price theory.'
comment in response to
post
'Why is there Money? Or yet a new attempt at solving the Hahn Problem'
journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/1052
Ah, well, money. We don't need a good explanation for it. Does it matter? No, let's go on with our very successful science.
comment in response to
post
Okay, economics is science, but espacially neoclassical economics is very, very bad science. How it is possible to give William Nordhaus a Nobel Prize for DICE? Or are there new funny solutions to the 'Hahn problem'? That's my absolute favorite of neoclassical economics.
comment in response to
post
Normally they don't do this, because it's expansive to run. Furthermore, there are many cycles on earth with very long time frames and it's a complex system with many factors.
Your 20-30years is what happens to the temp. if we would stop tomorrow, but this won't happen either.
comment in response to
post
'We perform millennium-long simulations of the future climate under three low-to-intermediate GHG emission scenarios as defined by the SSPs emulating different ECS in the range of 2 ∘C–5 ∘C'
iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...
Here is a study which looks at long term ECS.
comment in response to
post
Hansens 'climate forcing' isn't 4,8°C. The climate sensitivity is 4,8°C. This is about the equilibrium reached for the whole climate system. This will take many hundred of years/ thousands of years for everything. You misunderstand climate sensitivity with 'climate forcing' (which is 1,4W/m² now)
comment in response to
post
Yeah, 1917 CO2 was 300ppm. Now, it's 430ppm. (starting from 280ppm of the Holocene.)
comment in response to
post
Dankeschön. Als ich davon vor zwei Stunden erfahren habe, wollte ich selbiges machen. Gerne berichten, wie das verläuft.
comment in response to
post
Deutscheland: Wo selbst 'Linke' einfach rechte Menschenfeinde sind. Ich habe dieses Land in den letzten 1,5 Jahren nochmal ganz neu hassen gelernt, wie ich es nicht für möglich gehalten hätte.
comment in response to
post
We can get humans to Mars l, yes. But there are no technical wonders right to sustain human life on planet Mars. They need food, water, and oxygen? Are you suggesting we just send rocket after rocket? Landing a heavy rocket with mich supply without an atmosphere is also very difficult.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but it's still a stupid take.
comment in response to
post
No, this is just wrong. Oxygen, water, and food are somewhat necessary. Toxic Mars dust, radioactive surface, and low gravity are very problematic. Your hot take is just uninformed.
comment in response to
post
Besides. +2,75°C or a little bit more is catastrophally in of itself. No need to hype it up to +5°C at 2050.
comment in response to
post
I know about methane hydrates. Especially those at the bottom of continantel plates could(!) be very dangerous, I agree. But right now, most climate scientists don't acknowledge this as a problem in the next decades. I could be extremely dangerous, but it's alsoe highly unlikely until 2050.
comment in response to
post
I have read the last papers from Hansen et al. That's why i used +0,5°C/decade in the first place. +0,5°C to have some 'acceleration', but it's easier to follow if linear. Furthermore, Hansen isn't the only climate scientist in the world. The graphic of Jacobson agrees with me? What's your problem?
comment in response to
post
stfu you piece of shit!
comment in response to
post
Well, the stock markets don't reflect reality anymore. The next big crash like 2008 isn't far off anymore. Though there are still central banks which huge pockets but this market won't go into the '30s.
comment in response to
post
It's wrong. The worst case would be +0,4-0,5°C per decade. So 1,5°C + 2,5x0,5°C = 2,75°C. So more than +3°C is highly unlikely at 2050, but more than +2,0°C is almost certain.
comment in response to
post
The rich don't care and they have nothing to fear. Liberals are scum so nothing will change.
comment in response to
post
Achso, ein weiterer 'Grüner', der Heinrich Böll im Grabe rotieren lässt. Ihr seid echt das allerletzte.
comment in response to
post
Mensch Jan Philipp. Wie schafft man das eigentlich nach zwanzig Monaten online zu gehen und allen zu zeigen, dass man weder Ahnung noch einen Hauch von Menschlichkeit in sich trägt. Zudem scheinst Du Dich noch nie mit dem Recht auseinander gesetzt haben, welches Du hier mit Füßen trittst.
comment in response to
post
Dass ihr immernoch frech euer Maul aufreißt, ist wirklich kaum mehr zu fassen. Ihr habt den Sockel von dem ihr herunter moralisiert und skandalisiert, selbst zerstrümmert. Vielleicht einfach mal für das restliche Leben die Fresse halten?
comment in response to
post
Wie ich gerade sehe, bist Du noch relativ jung. Demnach muss ich gar nicht hoffen, dass es Dich mal genauso hart trifft. Das werden die allgemeinen Umstände schon besorgen. Haha, ihr seid sowieso alle gefickt in dem Alter. Prima, mit Dir trifft es den richtigen.
comment in response to
post
Keine Ahnung von Recht, kein Herz und keinen Verstand. Deine hasserfüllte und menschenverachtende Privatmeinung interessiert mich nicht. Ich habe sowieso schon zuviel Zeit mit einem unbelehrbaren Menschenfeind wir Dir verbracht. Wie gesagt: Hoffentlich trifft es Dich mal so hart! Und Tschüß.