waluigisleftfoot.bsky.social
241 posts
9 followers
23 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Perros está en China, lo cual no contradice para nada el canon puesto que Barcelona no está en China.
comment in response to
post
El katakana del final es incorrecto. Debería poner リンゴ, y pone リンユ", que es rinyu mal escrito. Espero que se tomen medidas drásticas al respecto y se despidan al menos un par de personas
comment in response to
post
Mira es muy fácil. Si eres del PP, lo que hace el PSOE es motivo de moción de censura, lo que hacen los tuyos es aceptable. Y si eres del PSOE gira las siglas y es igual. Pero claro si dices esto te van a caer palos de los dos lados
comment in response to
post
Partes de la suposición que todas las personas tienen sentido de la vergüenza o el ridículo, y en política es patente que la mayoría ni tiene. Si quedan en ridículo pero ganan elecciones han ganado desde su punto de vista. Pero dejar de votar a tu partido es una píldora de mal tragar.
comment in response to
post
No hablo por ti en particular. El asunto es que la reforma del sistema judicial la pueden hacer los partidos, así que es imposible de ejecutar mientras gobiernen partidos corruptos. Por eso digo que es una safe take, porque no se centra en el problema real
comment in response to
post
Es un safe take de libro. A estas alturas creer que la corrupción en la mayoría de partidos en España es una excepción en lugar de la norma es creer en los reyes magos. Si tiras del hilo se te cae la cúpula entera del PP y el PSOE. Pero el partidismo manda así que si lo hacen los tuyos hay silencio
comment in response to
post
Fuente?
comment in response to
post
@chocu.bsky.social, te parece bien que el paquete se refiera a ti con el sufijo informal -kun en lugar del más formal -san? Yo no sé si estás de acuerdo con estas confianzas que se traen.
comment in response to
post
I love the color design and what they're doing with the backgrounds. It looks like distilled happiness
comment in response to
post
You wouldn't believe it
comment in response to
post
Apocalypse Hotel
comment in response to
post
Cuando estoy en una competición de hacerme la víctima y mi rival es uno que "no es ni de izquierdas ni de derechas": 💀
comment in response to
post
Pues la verdad es que si porque aquí llueve un poquillo. Ya me jodería tener que pasar calor
comment in response to
post
You haven't addressed my counterargument
comment in response to
post
But it is centrist. You can try to be as mean as you want to me, but it's the truth. Idk why you take it so badly. Marxism is just an example. You can find people who oppose free healthcare and support UBI. Free healthcare is seen as more interventionist
comment in response to
post
No te gusta intentar improvisar una melodía mientras lees los versos y que dé toda la pena? Es la parte favorita de todos los lectores de fantasía.
comment in response to
post
So according to you, if it's their worst nightmare you think complete nationalization of the economy is preferable to UBI for centrists.
I think the issue is that you're so focused on what are the common proposals in contemporary politics that you forget the real wide range
comment in response to
post
You should consider why it has cross partisan support then. I think you'll agree that this is a strong argument in favor of being a centrist policy. It can be implemented in more left/right leaning approaches but we're talking UBI as a general concept. Non interventionist about markets is centrist
comment in response to
post
Hey, "that guy here". Read again what I said and think a bit of what you just said. The initial question is "no one can criticize UBI". And I said that there are leftists who criticize it. I even said I'm not specifically against UBI. Not my problem that you can't or don't want to understand nuance
comment in response to
post
Tell me you're American without telling me you're American
comment in response to
post
It is a centrist solution though. Just read what I said again rather than antagonizing me for some reason and tell me anything i said that you don’t agree with. I really don’t want to spend more energy in petty discussions
comment in response to
post
Yeah I can see how everyone is having a blast dunking on my position but I literally said I'm not personally against UBI. My point is: there are aspects to criticize about UBI. Which was the original question I replied. But no wish to ruin your time though you can keep discussing with your straw man
comment in response to
post
That's exactly what I was talking about. The idea that by giving more money to people market inefficiencies will disappear magically is a liberal myth. You're implying to be leftist or progressive but you're sitting in a centrist position at most.
comment in response to
post
I need to try DSII sooner or later. There are too many critics and designers that I follow praising it. It's just, the movement looks so clunky. DS1 is slow but it feels good.
comment in response to
post
To give an example: Marxists think UBI doesn't solve the issue because the means of production are still owned by an elite. It's similar to how the conservatives (optimates) in Rome implemented the free bread. It was to stop the reformist (populares) from implementing a land distribution program.
comment in response to
post
UBI was pushed mainly by liberals in Europe, which are center-right. I'm not necessarily against UBI, but idk why people think it's some sort of leftist holy grail. Many people pushing for UBI argue that once it's implemented subsidies or public healthcare should disappear and leave the market work
comment in response to
post
There are legitimate arguments from the left to oppose UBI. It's a non interventionist, neoliberal approach to markets that doesn't solve deeper issues like labor exploitation, greedflation or increasing rents. If not addressed, a huge chunk of UBI can fall again to capitalist hands by market forces
comment in response to
post
Porque hay pasta detrás. Es literal como lo que pasa en los videojuegos. Cuando no movían tanto dinero estaban los asustaviejas con que iban a volver loco a los niños, y ahora que existe una industria dedicada a crear ludopatia a menores no pasa nada mi rey dale.
comment in response to
post
*Pone el subwoofer al maximo*
WAKE ME UP
CAN’T WAKE UP
comment in response to
post
No se, pero en mi tierra decimos: en casa de palero, palos de palo.
comment in response to
post
Por lo que he leído, la OTAN no interviene en conflictos entre miembros. Por tanto, de ser verdad que los EEUU volaron el Nord Stream (pinta que si), la OTAN no puede hacer nada puesto que los dos países son miembros. Igual si a Grecia y Turquía les diera por atacarse. Si Israel ataca SI que debe
comment in response to
post
I don't think this is the problem. If anyone with nukes could boss the US, Pakistan or North Korea would too. The offensive nuclear threat is not believable when the US has several thousand nukes. Besides, France and the UK have them too. Israel is dependent on foreign aid they're not Iran.
comment in response to
post
That's not exactly it. Golda was a stupid b*tch. Israel could allow themselves to say such nonsense because the lobby is so powerful. But that's one of the red lines the US would never allow. If Israel did that it would disappear for good. Killing Palestinians is far more acceptable for them.
comment in response to
post
It always was
comment in response to
post
I'm not even a fan of most shows that people claim to be "calarts style" but holy hell. I think they hate watched Steven's Universe so much it permanently broke their brain
comment in response to
post
Yeah, drawing flies around people you don't like that's the high art he's talking about. "Haha they're poop people because they're dumb and evil because they don't think like me"
comment in response to
post
Microsoft is not merely compliant, they've been highly intertwined with the US government and the Pentagon for a long time. They received enormous military contracts years ago. They're a branch of the empire.
comment in response to
post
Just another reason why Europe and the world must stop their dependence on American tech. They finally lost all pretense of being a benevolent hegemon (that they never were) and go Russia/China style.
comment in response to
post
José Antonio y la repostería guilt free, name a more iconic duo
comment in response to
post
Ni que eurovision fuera el alunizaje de 1969… Es un concurso cutre donde muchos grupos se han negado a participar. Encima Israel lo usa para pretender que son una sociedad moderna en lugar de la Alemania nazi
comment in response to
post
So you deny the genocide. Well that's all I needed to know. Gbye
comment in response to
post
I'll keep the conversation if you agree that Israel is commiting genocide. If not I'll dismiss you as a zio and go on. The conversation will be absolutely useless if you're an irredentist for Israel.
comment in response to
post
Le has puesto 4 estrellas al Blue Prince? Para mí es candidato a GOTY pero me dio la impresión que te había gustado menos
comment in response to
post
Nice reference, but Cato would never say destroying Carthage is a difficult topic, he’d be “there’s still one city named Carthage in this world, and that’s an excessive amount” when asked if he wanted more wine
comment in response to
post
Are you serious? I won't even bother to translate your German ramblings. If you keep repeating nonsense you'll be blocked
comment in response to
post
Seek help, Zionism has taken your brain hostage.
comment in response to
post
Besides, I just posted a single comment but you're forcing me to explain my position. I could tell you to follow your example, redirect your energy to Zionists and Nazis. I think Norman Finkelstein is one of the most trustworthy people on Israel and Palestine. Do I look like a cryptofascist?
comment in response to
post
I don't even know if the person in question is Jewish. There are Christians who use such symbology. I haven't asked why they're using a star of David, of course it's their right to do so. The issue is, if you were Buddhist and you used a swastika on bluesky you'd want to clarify the meaning right.
comment in response to
post
That's because you're making an uncharitable reading of what I wrote. At no point have I said: "Are you Zionist? Explain yourself". I've assumed that it's not the case and explained why the confusion may exist.
comment in response to
post
I'm not saying Jews have any more of an obligation than gentiles to label themselves as antizionist. To me being Zionist is bad regardless of ethnicity. My point is, if I personally chose to use symbology that has been co-opted by extremist ideologies I'd make sure to signal what is my position.