waynedebaque.bsky.social
99 posts
24 followers
103 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Can we call him HalfPintHimmler?
Tried doing an alliteration with Eichmann, but am stuck....
comment in response to
post
Say what you will abt Rowling, but she was prescient in her description of Snatchers.
comment in response to
post
June 14 No Kings
July 14 Bastille Day
Coincidence?
I think NOT!
comment in response to
post
I see this...
comment in response to
post
Next, they'll claim KAG is in the Epstein files.
comment in response to
post
I'll believe TacoDon is 225# before I believe the charges against KAG.
comment in response to
post
Another take- can't claim credit for the idea, but couldn't these clowns meet on a Weehawken river bluff at dawn? (Hamilton - Burr reference)
comment in response to
post
Chicken fukkets
comment in response to
post
Presumes minds to lose.
comment in response to
post
No doubt the encounter took place outside the bathroom.
comment in response to
post
Lee: do you know if the sun rises in the east?
McMahon: I'd have to get back to you
comment in response to
post
Tbh, while a cyber attack would be "cleaner", it seems it would be trivial to take out the power grid this way, perhaps with a longer recovery time, as well.
comment in response to
post
A Pulitzer prize if GS says "you said that last week"
comment in response to
post
Hey, the ketchup isn't gonna hurl itself at the wall. Someone's gotta do it...
comment in response to
post
Lunatic
comment in response to
post
I agree, I just think it would be in their best interests to cut the losses sooner rather than later.
comment in response to
post
I don't understand why said law firms don't break whatever agreement they might think they have. It's not like they're dealing with a good faith actor.
comment in response to
post
TACO - the art of the squeal
comment in response to
post
Just out of curiosity, what keeps them from breaking the "deal"?
comment in response to
post
Joni - you first...
comment in response to
post
I'd like to imagine "off-boarding" means something like walking the plank, or being defenestrated at sea.
comment in response to
post
I suppose this is better than my Trump Pussy Factor way of describing it.
comment in response to
post
How do you spell Extortion... T R U M P
comment in response to
post
Our plan was to live abroad, just because. So we moved. Then $trumpette got elected. Pro: much calmer, saner. Con: can't resist... No joining protest rallies, no phone calls to reps/sens (prohibitive cost). Watching from afar is frustrating.
comment in response to
post
This is giving him way too much credit, imo. He's just a puppet having his strings pulled or a wimp who blusters and folds at the first sign of pushback
comment in response to
post
Alas, this question was answered long ago
comment in response to
post
Except, of course, for the bond market, which appears to pricing in the insanity factor.
comment in response to
post
I keep wondering why the markets don't tank, and realize they've priced in the "Trump Pussy Factor" to their future value calculations.
comment in response to
post
yer right... I don't trust a bunch of anti science zealots to do the right thing
comment in response to
post
Thank you and Mercí oh Cánada
comment in response to
post
Can we replace Karen and Chad with Karen and Donald?
comment in response to
post
Get Orange Jesus to turn it in to wine
comment in response to
post
Doesn't this, and (from what I read) the inclusion of no holding the Govt in contempt mean this is no longer a reconciliation bill, and thus subject to filibuster in the Senate?
comment in response to
post
Yet another example of the 4th Retch in action
comment in response to
post
Welcome to the rebellion, pal.
comment in response to
post
Me as a stockholder ain't a gonna eat nothin.
comment in response to
post
Stockholders will be watching as well
comment in response to
post
Said already, but he presumes a political remedy (impeachment) is going to work in a hostage situation (MAGA's strangle hold on 1/2 of Congress).
comment in response to
post
Well, the intent was a picture of Eichmann and Miller in the Started - Going genre
comment in response to
post
So the markets correctly priced in the Trump Pussy Factor. Knowing he would fold like the Whopper eating surrender monkey he is.
comment in response to
post
"business eats the tariffs"... I'm beginning to see how these clowns could bankrupt a casino
comment in response to
post
Did the Vatican bend the knee? We'll never know, but here's why it's bad news for Democrats.
comment in response to
post
6 Men and Two Babies
comment in response to
post
Ahhh, so Vance wins by forfeit....
comment in response to
post
Given the competition with Cruz, saying Vance is the most unlikable man in America is really saying something.
comment in response to
post
If we did amend the C to allow a binding congressional no-confidence vote (to force said snap elections), the Senate imbalance needs to be corrected 1st.