wdherndon.bsky.social
153 posts
150 followers
42 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Some months old, still relevant though.
If you haven't watched it or don't remember it, well worth it.
comment in response to
post
"No conscious" - I wish he slept all the time! He'd do considerably less damage. I think you mean "no conscience".
comment in response to
post
The more ruthless, violent, angry, dehumanizing, and brutal they become, the more we must become the counter point: we must love and care for our fellow human beings, express and embody solidarity, keep our own humanity alive!
comment in response to
post
She was responding to you saying I didn't provide proof. Frankly I'm amazed you need proof: I get incel/alpha male crap in my feeds daily, despite doing nothing to encourage it (that I'm aware of). The Speech Prof has a series on where they go wrong:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVED...
comment in response to
post
The reason is simple: you cannot change the Daddy Party - you can have perfect logical arguments, you can scream all day, nothing will phase him in the slightest, so you stop trying.
comment in response to
post
Men's meltdowns are angry tirades, because men aren't allowed to cry. Look at the crap coming from the incel movement and "alpha males" - you can't escape it, it's everywhere.
comment in response to
post
Same. And though that news tends to inflame me, it should: it really is that bad and we should get off our collective butts and do something.
comment in response to
post
Not same, /more/ tenacity.
comment in response to
post
www.youtube.com/@americanmed...
comment in response to
post
That's the same kind of guitar holder I have - very convenient to get down the guitar and play. Like I did a couple times yesterday. And the day before. I'm afraid I only have one - I gave away the others.
comment in response to
post
LOL
comment in response to
post
The "experiments" proved nothing whatsoever.
But while we're at it, neither motion nor existence can be without the other and, IMO, E=mc^2 shows they are, surprisingly, one and the same.
comment in response to
post
Duh!
Non sequitur much?
Your superdeterminism far from completing QM is untestable balderdash that looks designed to troll people.
comment in response to
post
Why are you trolling people?
comment in response to
post
It needs to have predictive power beyond what we now have, not just a reformulation that gives the same result.
comment in response to
post
Yes. Is there a useful non-local model?
comment in response to
post
I agree retrocausal is necessary for super-determinism, so super-determinism is unnecessary for useful models.
The thing is, it's only retrocausal from our perspective.
A photon pair are created, travel 0 d in 0 t and are absorbed - from their perspective. Perhaps other particle interactions, too.
comment in response to
post
Another reason not to visit the US right now. As if I needed yet another reason.