white-dove.bsky.social
UK - Follow SWFC Ex member of Thatchers 'Enemy within'. Proud to have worked in NHS for 25yrs. Retired, Autism isn't an illness. Blocker. #UKRAINE #Woke
238 posts
79 followers
54 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
well let me explain... I didn't read the whole column as it's either full or ads or you have to subscribe. none of which appeals to me. I'm sure you've done a first rate job and a 'well done' is warranted - let me know if there is a petition .. i'll gladly sign.
comment in response to
post
Only because the op appeared to emphasise British women when I don't think this sort of thing stops at Britain.
comment in response to
post
Whatever
comment in response to
post
No, it's laced with ads, but I've since read the thread and seen some figures AND commented on them (you obviously haven't seen it). It asks more questions than it answers.
comment in response to
post
I wonder if the meaning of "selfish" has been changed in the dictionary to something I don't recognise? I wouldn't call royalty selfish. Privileged yes. I would call those born mid eighties selfish brought about by Thatcher
comment in response to
post
I still pay to be in a union even though I'm retired.
comment in response to
post
Just been there. Not greatly prolific but enough to raise the issue, although it would be interesting to see the details of why police time is being taken up with these cases?
comment in response to
post
That's quite a headline! Do you have statistics on how may "British" women have been prosecuted or put under a police investigation? Over say, the last 20 years?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
did they give any reason? Like - our business is based in the USA and are afraid what Trump might do to us?
comment in response to
post
Blinkin heck I was panicking there with that simple maths question on human verification. 😁
comment in response to
post
Wow, that looks tall
comment in response to
post
Well I'd love to if you heard an entirely different part than that I saw on YouTube and ran it over and over to get his precise wording. 😘
comment in response to
post
well the video I saw him discussing it in May didn't. He did say every 3 mths they have a meeting to view, collectively, the audience figures as a graph and they all could see who's job MAY BE at risk from that. Now you may say he said that but I assure you in that video I saw, he did not.
comment in response to
post
2/2 ...from denying that your departure wasn't linked to antisemitism rather than, as @mrjamesob.bsky.social put it "allow it (the rumours), to fester"? If he knew you were restricted why act in the way he did??
comment in response to
post
1/2 It's a trying time @sangitamyska.bsky.social and I feel for you, not only for loosing your LBC spot but also feeling betrayed by ex colleagues. I can't help wondering why the NDA would not permit you ....
comment in response to
post
Just to clarify. He DID NOT say "her audience figures were not acceptable". and RAJAR had supposedly reported "We reached record average audiences in excess of 500,000 a week in 2 separate quarters" which doesn't mean much out of context.
comment in response to
post
Yes, just seen this and, although James didn't actually name Sangita as being the "only person who could stop the conspiracies" It was strongly eluded to. So, @mrjamesob.bsky.social you really do need to clear that one up re the NDA?
comment in response to
post
No. It was great and no distractions. I got more done.
comment in response to
post
I'm 66 and got mine 2 years ago.
comment in response to
post
Grrrreat!
comment in response to
post
KurtChester66Red Barry Wilkinson, has been exposed as a bomb dropper and blocker when anyone questions his speel. Sorry but, you just can't lean on that crutch. It's flawed mate.
comment in response to
post
Cowardice is rather bland. Don't go having a sideswipe at someone and then instantly blocking them without allowing a response which, I might add, is another way of one admitting finding themselves in a weak position in a debate.
comment in response to
post
There isn't a national rule in the UK making it mandatory for every new home to include a "nest brick" (often referred to as a "swift brick" or "bee brick"). However, there is significant discussion and campaigning around this, and some local authorities have already implemented such policies.
comment in response to
post
bigotry isn't a policy. With regards to your "claims" (as wild as they are) I think, with respect, you may be getting mixed up with the Tory government rather than the current one. Have a nice 'conspiracy' day 😘
comment in response to
post
"We have underlined the need for trusts to cut bureaucracy to invest even further in the front line so we can support hard-working staff and deliver a better service for patients and taxpayers' money."
comment in response to
post
"they had had to stop accepting referrals for adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)" this effects me directly!
comment in response to
post
If true, that's crazy??? I'll look into that later. Not calling you for misleading at all but like to get data facts rather than hear third+ hand.
comment in response to
post
What, in particular, do you feel is regressive in the current policies?
comment in response to
post
2/2 Emailed letters (messages in effect) overcome barriers such as scruffy handwriting, spelling, structure and grammar and allows the sender to make changes prior to sending and saves trees.
comment in response to
post
1/2. I think callers are getting mixed up between letters and other things that can be placed in an envelope. A WhatsApp, rather than email, is a much more personalised method for other things.
comment in response to
post
Norm, who's Norm?
comment in response to
post
I'm sure there is a lot more to the agreement than highlighted here but I find it odd that, after the "agreement" for trade with Oz and others "won" by the tories were never debated as, I understand it, they were atrocious "deals" highlighted as a "Brexit positive" ??
comment in response to
post
I thought activating those buttons didn't effect the lighting sequencing at all? I thought it was just a way of activating the visual indicators for pedestrians??
comment in response to
post
Sorry, you've lost me on this one.