willkurman.bsky.social
65 posts
254 followers
43 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
He was a fabulous guy. I think part of people’s low opinion was a) his humility (in accordance with his faith) & b) going by “Jimmy”. It’s a Southern thing. You get west of Fort Worth, or north of Louisville, and people take it as a diminutive. (I myself am a Hoosier.)
comment in response to
post
He's an old white guy with a beard who lives in the sky. (Just like when I was a kid in Sunday school, Jesus was a blonde.) Why would that be controversial?
comment in response to
post
You want to read the “Word of God”?
Go pick up a freshman Physics textbook.
comment in response to
post
No apple pie for you, Rick. More for the rest of us.
comment in response to
post
Isolationism is another term for weakness.
comment in response to
post
Of course they will rewrite history. These guys are following the Soviet model. Aiming for “free & fair” elections in a one-party State.
comment in response to
post
Looks like that’s part of the ‘making things great again’ plan.
Unfortunately, the original architects of ‘greatness’ surrendered in 1865. But given time, maybe we can go back again?
comment in response to
post
Your comment makes too much sense. It probably won’t penetrate into that particular mentality.
comment in response to
post
Well. Even if he’s right, you’re still about 971,354 times smarter than that lump.
comment in response to
post
What does ’woke’ even mean?
Seems like it decrypts to “I don’t like you.”
comment in response to
post
And if you can't ignore him, make fun of him.
comment in response to
post
then why are you speaking?
comment in response to
post
The likeness is uncanny – for both!
comment in response to
post
Yes – and let's not forget Spy vs. Spy
comment in response to
post
He's saluting America's Hitler. Where's the mystery?
comment in response to
post
and who is that, wearing the Spy vs. Spy hat?
comment in response to
post
Just the word makes my mouth water.
O Canada! What a marvelous innovation with which you’ve gifted the world!
comment in response to
post
“Apparatchik” is the totally correct term.
These guys are neo-Soviets.
Just wait until the revisionist history kicks in.
comment in response to
post
I’ll tell you. Sitting in the theater in 1968 (12 years old) — that ending was shocking and entirely unexpected. Back then, at least — it worked!
comment in response to
post
They certainly have put in enough sincere attempts.
Do you think this season might be “the one”?
comment in response to
post
Trump is deeply lacking in masculinity (the attribute he is claiming to excel at).
A total wimp.
comment in response to
post
Officiating overall is pretty funky. The Mahomes incidents are are just the tip of the iceberg.
(Nothing against 15 here. He is a thoroughly amazing player and the ‘rigged’ refs are not his fault.)
comment in response to
post
Please show us how to eat it!
comment in response to
post
Soon, it will be required for all Federal appointees.
comment in response to
post
You know, I encountered Prince on a hot afternoon at a corner bodega in “Nordeast” Minneapolis in the early ’80s. This skinny little guy looked me up & down like I was a pork chop, but I brushed by him.
Some time later, when he got famous, I was like “OMG — that was…”
comment in response to
post
You’re right — and perhaps more insidiously, they can be “updated” at any time. Giving those in control the opportunity to rewrite history.
comment in response to
post
If you can abolish the 14th Amendment by Executive Order, then you can do the same to the 1st Amendment, or…the 2nd Amendment.
Is that really a precedent they want to establish?
comment in response to
post
Oho…so is that why he wants to get rid of the 14th Amendment?
comment in response to
post
How about getting McCarthy back?
That would be apropos.
comment in response to
post
The paw placement is charming.
comment in response to
post
Tastes great.
Doesn’t smell so good when they roast the beans, though.
I figured roasting drives off all the bad stuff.
comment in response to
post
OK, I got it. We’re replacing one empty bus with 50 empty cars. Nice move!
comment in response to
post
She’s mad at him for prosecuting cop killers?
Not a good look…
comment in response to
post
Well, I am sure he’s using the “royal we”.
comment in response to
post
OK, that’s a pretty clear explanation.
Now try getting a MAGA-ite to explain what it means.
comment in response to
post
Now THAT’s positive.
That way he can show us all how it’s done.
comment in response to
post
…and set that bong aside.
comment in response to
post
Books are so much better than videos/movies. In a movie, the main characters NEVER look like they did in my mind’s eye when I read the book.
comment in response to
post
He’ll be reversing himself before long. Just be patient for the next few months.
comment in response to
post
So, let me guess: the “1776” people are now in support of a monarchy?
comment in response to
post
The non-billionaires may have to rethink matters once a head of lettuce costs them $25.