xendra.bsky.social
Whoa, it’s Xen!
she/her
255 posts
251 followers
603 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I had happenstance applied on the same day as the order, with an expedited process, so I'll definitely let you know what comes back in a few weeks (if anything.)
comment in response to
post
And that's been what's wrong with so much of how NYT and other anti-trans media have approached this: they're acting like trans people are making demands for MORE rights when we're really mostly just asking for our EXISTING rights to not go away. It's a sleight of hand. They know what they're doing.
comment in response to
post
Which is why, instead of communicating through private, encrypted channels, they post "code" in public spaces, you see.
comment in response to
post
You found the point, well done!
comment in response to
post
If this were true, he'd be directing state and local law enforcement to protect Californians instead of collaborating with ICE under the guise of "keeping the peace"
comment in response to
post
I can't handle how cool this is
comment in response to
post
I'm not talking about differences of opinions. Please read what I'm saying more carefully; the problem is that his positions change based on what will give him the best path toward electability. He says what he needs to in order to win, regardless of his actual beliefs.
comment in response to
post
The problem isn't that he's imperfect, it's that he's untrustworthy. His stances shift with whatever will make him the most electable, and he's always been that way. Now he's banking on "enemy of your enemy" optics, and that's all.
comment in response to
post
Hey, you finally made it! Make yourself at home 🥰
comment in response to
post
Oh dang, I can't rely on a weird anti-immigrant kid on the Internet, that sucks so bad, dang
comment in response to
post
It's not a zero-sum game, babes.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, I should advocate for my cause in the place where I've been dogpiled by hundreds of people calling me slurs without recourse. Thats how you affect change.
comment in response to
post
They should invent a way to inform readers what an article is about, then. A topic line they could present at the head which would give some idea and invite readers to read further.
comment in response to
post
Oh, no it's fine actually, they have a permit.
comment in response to
post
Many are saying so
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Seriously, like what do they think the long term results of "fistfight the feds" is going to be? Do they think if they knock one out, the gestapo just go home? "Pack it up, boys, he won." Power fantasy ass
comment in response to
post
Rage bait is so boring, kid.
comment in response to
post
Of course. Rather than determining root causes and addressing those, they devise a way to profit further off of the symptoms. How predictably exploitive.
comment in response to
post
Imagine considering yourself the moral high ground while advocating that a woman kill herself for voicing grievances against an unjust system. This is embarrassing behavior, my man.
comment in response to
post
Brilliantly written; thank you for laying it out plainly for those who don't realize the severity of the situation
comment in response to
post
Happy Estroversary! It's hardly fair to look so good AND have only correct takes, but here you are 💛
comment in response to
post
Yes, I did, and yes, I can. I'm not doing your homework for you but here, they even linked the research source. Educate yourself.
(Now comes the part where instead of caring about the subject and reading, he accuses me of not fulfilling his demands!)
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
comment in response to
post
No, you did give arguments. They just don't hold up under those made by actual experts in the linked article you were provided. If anything, you're doing that which you accuse everyone else of doing.
comment in response to
post
Hey man, what do you think "prove wrong" means?
What do you think it means when experts in the subject unilaterally disagree with a take from a layman?
comment in response to
post
That's one of the problems with being such a small minority. Our allies totally outnumber us. So even if they think they're helping, they're going to talk over us and what we actually want is going to be drowned out by what other people think is best for us
comment in response to
post
Allegedly. But what's your point? Whether that's true or not, the fact remains that lives were saved by the act, which is what's being said here.
comment in response to
post
I mean ideally CEOs would change policy so that the lives would be saved without the need for that incentive.
comment in response to
post
You feel really strongly about this
comment in response to
post
Hey what if you didn't base the entirety of your happiness on having sex in the first place?
comment in response to
post
Weird ass reply
comment in response to
post
We are the same 🤝💛
comment in response to
post
Oh, well you see, you've only spouted the usual maga party lines the whole time, and in addition to being nonsense, it was really boring too.
But yeah I'm going to mock weird transphobes, because bigots shouldn't know peace
comment in response to
post
Whoa.
Now you're Super Mad
comment in response to
post
lol okay
antisemitism.org.uk/wp-content/u...
comment in response to
post
"Cultural Marxist?" lmao antisemitism wasn't the direction I expected you to take this, but I appreciate your willingness to undercut your own position.
comment in response to
post
lol you're mad.
comment in response to
post
Be optimistic if you like, but it's irresponsible to tell others who are in greater danger than you perceive that they should chill about it. I hope you're as privileged as you sound, and stay safe, I do. But please understand that there are people with better grasps of political implications.