zeroantics.bsky.social
18 posts
41 followers
128 following
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I think the issue with this graphic is most Reform voters are actually in favour of these things.
comment in response to
post
I miss the days when the only time you’d see this level of batshit would be on a Louis Theroux documentary called “Louis’ Wacky American Vacay” but now these people have access to professional AV equipment and might become a member of congress.
comment in response to
post
What do you think a national inquiry is? The above report is the national inquiry using 6 case studies from all over the country. It is literally about grooming gangs.
comment in response to
post
They’ve had a national inquiry. You saying there hasn’t been one doesn’t change the fact Theresa May commissioned one in 2014, it took 7 years and cost £100 million.
comment in response to
post
Read it. What I have linked is an inquiry into grooming gangs that includes Durham, Swansea, Warwickshire, St Helens, Tower Hamlets and Bristol. This was a report which was part of the national inquiry in 2022.
comment in response to
post
This implies there was a cover up. Which as far as I’m aware there isn’t any evidence of one.
comment in response to
post
We have though.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/61f926...
comment in response to
post
Problem with Spoons is it’s owned by Tim Martin who is a massive cunt.
comment in response to
post
Interesting article that gave me the perspective of someone who actually needs people to visit their site to make a living. If Elon wants to keep people on his platform he’s doing an awful job of making it appealing. One of the final straws for me was the huge amount of tedious bot spam/phishing.
comment in response to
post
So glad their blue tick elevates their enlightened rambling above other people on Musk’s wonderful free speech app.
comment in response to
post
I thought you meant the piece about Charles’s crown wobbling was some sort of metaphor for the declining support for the royal family but no. It was literally him worried about the physical movement of his crown, such inspiring journalism.
comment in response to
post
That is simply just made up nonsense about Oxford. People in Oxford can go wherever they like, there are restrictions to reduce through traffic across the city but to call it a prison is completely misrepresenting what the reality is.
comment in response to
post
I’d argue the train did more for the common person in the 1920s in terms of widening their options. The car was still very much a luxury item in the 1920s. Nowadays many people are obliged to fork out for a car and all the associated costs due to car centric planning.
comment in response to
post
Interesting. If this hypothetical person was really upsetting your customers, shouting personal abuse etc. Would “censorship” be bad in this case? Or should free speech reign supreme in all scenarios?
comment in response to
post
Ok well just use the business example. You ask the person to leave your place of business due to them voicing views you and your customers find offensive. They’re free to continue to voice those views outside your business. Is that censorship?
comment in response to
post
How would you apply this logic IRL. Someone comes into your home/business and started spouting opinions you didn’t like/found offensive. You ask them to leave as the owner of the property. If they don’t, it becomes trespass. Are you also censoring them? They can still gob off outside.
comment in response to
post
1000 days if you’re not counting Russia’s “little green men” in Crimea, Donbas and Luhansk.
comment in response to
post
Something something two tier policing etc etc