I'm hearing a lot of divided opinion nationally on the issue of Ian hanomansing having to give me his house. In the interest of balance, I'll make sure both sides are given equal space, obviously. But obviously we'll be having this conversation ignoring any other dynamics at play. So that'll be fun.
Comments
Balance is not divisive!
Do you know how the US ended up here?
They both sided themselves off a cliff.
But don't threaten me, you should read the posts I have openly addressed to Ian since yesterday. I have disagreed with the US being part of this and that we do not need conversation.
I have said since yesterday and been forceful about the US not being party to this and not having a voice.
I was firm that this radio show should not be aired.
My words fell short of explaining this in Steve's post.
But I do not in any way believe the US should be included in any discussion about our sovereignty.
So don't attack me.
I did not say K Oleary is balance. I know what I said, relax and breathe. Take a minute.
I have no idea why people pick out one post & read it without following through or looking at what was posted prior just to argue who's right or wrong.
Give me a break.
I didn't express myself well. The US should not have a voice in our 'house', I have been beating that drum since yesterday. I meant the topic is leaning 'right' in Canada, such as the likes of K Oleary having a guest appearance, how about A Dickenson too?
You can rely that there will be a time delay between what one says on the phone & it going out on the feed.
I expect they would suddenly “lose” such a caller and “take another call,” while they “try to get that [original] caller back.”
Agreed. I'm reading "We're" as "the media", and this should stand. Would we give Hitler a mic to "discuss" his plans of a comeback. Not a chance. The US is threatening our sovereignty; they don't get to discuss that in our house.
Who needs or wants to give equal treatment to that?
Which they’re not.