And what is the common denominator? Oh yeah. Both scenarios victimize women. FUCK THE PATRIARCHY! And I'm saying that as the creation of an old white dude.
Until there is mass movement against the rich, there will continue to be disparity in who the law favors. The wealth gap will grow, and this disparity will continue to grow. What we need is to unite and move against these rich criminals who believe they are above the law.
A president can sick millions of followers on unsuspecting victims by lying, intimidation, direct encouragement, and itβs just free speech hyperbole.
The law exists as THE alternative to vigilantism every time the law protects the strong and hurts the weak, every domestic abuse ignored, every treatable illness denied, every billionaire or crooked cop that walks free we slip back towards the jungle of might makes right.
oh well yeah. There's literally videos of this. One of an older woman who was speaking to police in her own home telling them that her husband was going to kill her, then he even joked about it right in front of them, and what do you know, he killed her...
Comments
A way bigger deal
You would think the police that arrested her would at least be aware that they are destroying the credibility of law enforcement
Why make everything about identity politics? It's not.
It's about $
-George Carlin
thanβ
Well delivered.
Should we be comforted that if she was a wealthy CEO then she would be protected?
Like school shootings.
No one cares for the women or the children anymore.
Not as they should.
The most powerful people are too afraid to shoulder what they ask children to carry every day.
Grown ass men.
Turned to mewling babies,
over what our children have come to do "drills" over in school
Pathetic. That's what it is.
Insane time in America.