And add further to this, these are people who the US government is arguing in court have already been removed! They are not removable anymore, they are in fact, people who have been removed! So any imprisonment is obviously unconstitutional.
Reposted from
Paul Gowder
Oh, also, re the El Salvador concentration camp, Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896), by the way. The punitive imprisonment even of removable immigrants without trial has been clearly established to be unconstitutional for over a century.
Comments
Do not make the same fatal mistake as millions of European jews in WW2. Here is a non-comprehensive list of the vulnerable. Don’t gamble with your life.
https://www.jandehn.com/post/american-shitstorm-2-0
If the US rounds up a bunch of migrants at the Mexican border, doesn't even take down their names, and flies them to South Sudan to sell them into slavery, how does a Court reverse that?
A court might not be able to compel their return but they could certainly order those payments for their detention to stop.
It's 2025 and the United States government is trafficking is selling slaves to foreign countries for profit.
Good morning.
"During the first Trump administration, he was also appointed to the U.S. Alien Terrorist Removal Court as its chief judge, a term that ended earlier this year."
Therefore, he has been allowing them to bury themselves in their ignorance of law