Seeing a lot of misunderstanding about the “expected beliefs” in the Rubio letter about Mr. Khalil.
For clarity, the letter is citing a *restriction* in the law intended to *limit* the use of the foreign affairs grounds of exclusion and deportation against people for protected speech to rare cases.
For clarity, the letter is citing a *restriction* in the law intended to *limit* the use of the foreign affairs grounds of exclusion and deportation against people for protected speech to rare cases.
Comments
I'm sick over it.
Here’s a fascinating footnote on how it made it into law, featuring Senators Kennedy and Moynihan.
The above comes from Massieu v. Reno, the case where Trump’s sister in 1996 ruled that the law was unconstitutional. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/915/681/1618129/
We have no evidence Rubio has done that, but all four Chairs are GOP so they might just be sitting on it.