More evidence BlueSky is toxic.
This site had a higher ratio of nutjobs celebrating the CEO murder than 8CHAN. AND 4CHAN. AND TWITTER.
Y’all. Time to do some soul searching.
This site had a higher ratio of nutjobs celebrating the CEO murder than 8CHAN. AND 4CHAN. AND TWITTER.
Y’all. Time to do some soul searching.
Comments
So if the legal system fails in protecting the citizens, then use the society’s favourite weapon.
The gun.
Then the death of a CEO who decides who dies, will be celebrated by that gun loving society.
I don't think this is telling about the platform's overall level of toxicity, not to agree or disagree with your conclusion.
It is not reasonable to expect that rage to look civilized.
Too many Americans have nothing left to lose.
if a criminal can become president, then it seems fine to celebrate such an act.
Step one: pick the one event that collaborates a pre-made narrative
Step two: ignore everything else
Step three: knock the chess pieces on the board over like a pigeon
https://peoplespopulistpress.wordpress.com/2024/12/24/hello-world/
We discuss the paper and provide the source to it in this thread.
Suffice it to say, it's a very flawed paper.
It's a job; he's not in unilateral control.
Also, the liberal position is one of opposing capital punishment.
People really think offing an employee will usher in a revolution in a democratic nation.
His death is a benefit to all of mankind.
I’ve searched my soul on the topic. Pondered whether such a brazen act warranted the death penalty. Decided I still think the death penalty is wrong and is not a power we should go be to the government.
Lots of us went over it here and it's a very very flawed paper.
https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/hashtags-and-hit-lists-social-medias
relax. turn on a white noise generator and feel secure in knowing you don't matter to us
https://networkcontagion.us/reports/12-18-24-killing-with-applause-emergent-permission-structures-for-murder-in-the-digital-age/
Here's a few of us going through it and pointing out how flawed of a paper it is.
>gab at 2.56
you know what they say about broken clocks.
https://bsky.app/profile/ceylene.bsky.social/post/3le3lodc44k2m
@brianna.bsky.social, you should remove this post
The correct response to failures of our healthcare system is to vote for the party that's bribed by healthcare companies slightly less than the other party.
Surely that will affect change...right? Right?
Feels morally correct to judge, condemn, and withhold sympathy for the CEO unless evidence emerges of him actively lobbying to end private health insurance.
And based on the fact that the assailant usurped power to end life based on his own opinion.
Expressing opinion though violence is wrong, but doesn't the status quo also kill?
It is irrational to expect people to stay as punching bags forever. Many rights today were won through violence.
While MLK did not like violent protest - he correctly understood the predictable outcome that they arise from unaddressed social injustices.
Many successful US labor protests involved violence towards their bosses.
Maybe work on your own mental disorder instead of attacking someone else for simply saying violent protests have worked in the past.
I'm more existentially conflicted about whether withholding sympathy for the CEO makes me more or less "human." Judgment is human.
And what about feeling glee? Can my glee for his death outweigh my concern for the social fabric and the rule of law?
I agree with you but would put a 2 to express the nuance. Strictly rational response is 1.. so the study in discussion is flawed
https://networkcontagion.us/reports/12-18-24-killing-with-applause-emergent-permission-structures-for-murder-in-the-digital-age/
It's a survey and they do not disclose how they created the charts and took 6 of the 7 buckets and lumped them into 1.