One of the key aims of a new collider is to investigate exactly *how* and *why* electroweak symmetry breaking occurred.
How and why did fundamental particles acquire mass? π€π§ͺβοΈ
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tYseyO3-8l0
Check out the "Case for a new collider" series.
Series link: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzdgklfCMnKKopQ2mK2Pu5dhuwSelnx7&si=nvQaGJmh2Rpi21lx
How and why did fundamental particles acquire mass? π€π§ͺβοΈ
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tYseyO3-8l0
Check out the "Case for a new collider" series.
Series link: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzdgklfCMnKKopQ2mK2Pu5dhuwSelnx7&si=nvQaGJmh2Rpi21lx
Comments
Then of the tiny, tiny proportion which does understand, how many understand what sort of a new collider will do this? And how?
Is this truly the best sales pitch for it?
Saying "Everything is stupid and too expensive" is very easy and brings contrarian clicks and engagement. It makes people feel like they have a good handle on things.
Carefully explaining the case is difficult and takes time.
https://home.cern/science/cern/fcc-study-media-kit-2024#:~:text=The%20benefit%2Fcost%20ratio%20is,More%20information%20here.
Hopefully, itβs a work in progress
It's time to take them back and make the positive case.
Even more with the DOGE witch hunts getting started. For pure science in the US Particle Physics will be high on the cancel list.
I will discuss the various forms in the next episode.