Oof. Bad look $MSFT and Nature
Reposted from
Henry Legg
Why does this matter? In the peer review process for their new @nature.com Microsoft Quantum repeated the same falsehood about our paper (Hess et al.)
Their comment was peer reviewed at PRL & was not accepted. Now they publish in Nature using the same false claim.
Don't trust MSFT Quantum.
Their comment was peer reviewed at PRL & was not accepted. Now they publish in Nature using the same false claim.
Don't trust MSFT Quantum.
Comments