You will never convince me that "Nintendo saved the video game industry in 1983" is reasonable historiography, because it's 2025 and I have now lived through about a billion technological innovations, all transparently less meritorious than video games, all stubbornly surviving markets bottoming out
Comments
In 1983, you actually *could* kill an industry if you fucked up enough.
I think I'm with you on this.
ZX Spectrum, Atari ST, Amiga 500...
Then in the 90s we moved on to PlayStations & then PCs in the 2000s
Not a Nintendo in sight although obviously someone was buying them somewhere...
I did try a Wii but it didn't last
To be fair I was never a fan of NTSC. The fewer lines seemed to make a big difference
1st went to US & the late 80s, Florida. Great hols but telly not so good & bought some tourist VHS tapes for my dual PAL/NTSC VCR
Didn't get to try any games there. Yeah we were pretty fortunate
"Saved video games" is an overstatement, but the impact wasn't irrelevant. We'd still have games, but the industry would look completely different.
The Quartz Crisis was an existential threat to mechanical watchmaking in a way that the 1983 video game crash simply was not to video gaming, or even video gaming consoles.
But Swatch is basically a consortium, not an individual company, and even if it failed, *watches would still fucking exist*
(Which by comparison goes to show you how ridiculous the romanticism of Nintendo's supposed "rescue" of the industry was — even if video games had been totally put in the grave, that was just a blip on Japan's economic radar in 1983)
Wasn't the gaming crash of '83 specifically console gaming, and specifically in North America? like, I know that it's kind of a whole thing that Nintendo wasn't nearly as big of a deal in the UK because they had much stronger competition from the home computer market
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pl-CewTAl8