What strikes me, again and again, about so much of the writing around the hypothetical uses of these technologies is how much the people doing that writing would appear to dislike, or be burdened by, having to think.
Reposted from
Charlie Warzel
what a grim and honestly unimaginative idea of what the future could hold www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/o...
Comments
Horrible idea.
But it has to be driven as a profit-center with touted universal appeal instead of seeing that value. :-/
Maybe.
... I've heard it both ways.
Why would I want to remember getting kicked in the head by a horse?
And then we meet her and we're like "ohhhh HE'S the problem"
That's simple. There weren't any, and I didn't.
Yeah, we are not simply what we type into search boxes and microblogs. I'm very careful to minimize where I can.
I don't listen to book suggestions on Amazon, why would I take other AI-based advice?
Or when Apple Music decides to include sound effects files in its auto-shuffling of my library. No, I don't want to hear Enya followed by a burst of machine gun fire and a car squealing off. (Sound designer problems.)