This could be an important paper (still only preprint) as its authors, using proper analytical measures, find concrete elements showing that "long vax" is a thing Remember: LV is not recognized as a condition so far 1/2 - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

jeanfisch.bsky.social • 8 days ago

This could be an important paper (still only preprint) as its authors, using proper analytical measures, find concrete elements showing that "long vax" is a thing

Remember: LV is not recognized as a condition so far

1/2

Comments

jeanfisch.bsky.social•8 days ago

I write "could" because I read the paper three times and don't understand how they managed to extract a "long vax" signal from "long covid" (ie induced by an infection) but they say they did address it

Any insights welcome if other did understand!

Here the link: https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf

2/2

jeanfisch.bsky.social•8 days ago

Here some insightful context on the study by @marcveld.bsky.social

If I understand correctly, it's a bit what I felt: the study is well done but, conclusion-wise, probably limited by the size of the sample and the confounders

https://bsky.app/profile/marcveld.bsky.social/post/3limfj45jar2y

jeanfisch.bsky.social•8 days ago

@acritschristoph.bsky.social goes actually further and puts forward some indirect confounders around the time since the latest infection (which is shorter in those self-declaring post-vac syndrome and hence one would expect a higher residual response)

https://bsky.app/profile/acritschristoph.bsky.social/post/3limnrqnarc2m

yousitonmyspot.bsky.social•8 days ago

cc @gidmk.bsky.social @enirenberg.bsky.social

Maybe you understand it.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply