Teagasc IFJ letter in response to @murphy-bokern.bsky.social fails to answer his critique.
–Dr. MB said the problem is that Teagasc *is* causing confusion & it is Teagasc's methane messaging (NOT the organisation!) that "borders on climate change denial and serves neither farmers nor citizens."
1/2
–Dr. MB said the problem is that Teagasc *is* causing confusion & it is Teagasc's methane messaging (NOT the organisation!) that "borders on climate change denial and serves neither farmers nor citizens."
1/2
Comments
So IMO, claiming an 8% cut by 2040 is sufficient agri CH4 mitigation is misleading & amounts to political advocacy.
2/2