This ridiculous passage from the New York Times today exemplifies why the Lib establishment is unprepared to meet the moment. Hochul *has* the legal authority to fire Adams, but shouldn’t because it would “muddy the waters”?? So when your opponent does something illegal, you unilaterally disarm???
Comments
Against Adams, Mamdani is our best choice (Lander is our second best choice.)
Against Hochul, @aoc.bsky.social is our best choice.
Too complicated for a single post, but it's not just "remove the corrupt bozo, and we're good" --- downstream there are other bozos waiting.