To note, one of the authors who checked before is me, so if I am finger pointing, I am pointing at myself.
The mistakes here are the hard-to-catch type: journal abbreviations and capitalizations, erroneous page ranges...
More common ones are author initials inconsistent, page range formatting...
The mistakes here are the hard-to-catch type: journal abbreviations and capitalizations, erroneous page ranges...
More common ones are author initials inconsistent, page range formatting...
Comments
If you are sloppy with your references, especially if it is in a way you would have caught it if you looked even *once* at the output of your software, I must assume you do the same when you manage and process data, or plan your experimental controls.
In my experience, though, sloppy preparation and sloppy logic/analysis tend to go hand in hand.
I agree: one should read the full MS. Of course.